[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Mark Jeftovic) writes:
Verisign sold off NetSol to Pivotal Private Equity last year for 100
million, which takes them out of the registrar space and leaves them
as the registry.
it'll be several quarters, and one audited annual report, before we'll
know how much control
Not, I hasten to add, that I support Sitefinder or WLS (although I think I
like consolidate). But what I like isn't the issue. Even if having
Just to recap here, this thread plus the articles I'm reading miss one of the
major points (a commercial one essentialy)..
Verisign is really two
On Fri, 27 Feb 2004, Stephen J. Wilcox wrote:
Verisign is really two entities wrt .com/net - it is the registry and the
registrar. As a registrar it occupies the same position as the many other
registrars.. tucows, melbourne, joker etc .. as a registry it occupies a
privileged position in
Verisign is really two entities wrt .com/net - it is the registry and the
registrar.
Verisign Registrar, aka Network Solutions, was sold off to Pivotal Private
Equity last Fall.
Other lines of analysis to attempt:
o what are registry services and what are not.
o if a
http://techupdate.zdnet.com/special_report/Stratton_Sclavos.html
http://biz.yahoo.com/rc/040226/tech_verisign_2.html
can't say I'm surprised. Another nail in the Verisign coffin.
On Thu, 26 Feb 2004, Deepak Jain wrote:
Since no one else has mentioned this:
http://biz.yahoo.com/rc/040226/tech_verisign_2.html
Looks like I need to stock up on popcorn.
--
Jay Hennigan - CCIE #7880 - Network Administration - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
WestNet: Connecting you to the planet. 805
On Thu, 26 Feb 2004, Roman Volf wrote:
When are they up for renewal exactly?
November 10, 2007, according to
http://www.icann.org/tlds/agreements/verisign/registry-agmt-com-25may01.htm
-S
in response to...
http://biz.yahoo.com/rc/040226/tech_verisign_2.html
X-Mailer: MH-E 7.4; nmh 1.0.4; GNU Emacs 21.3.1
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Neil J. McRae) writes:
can't say I'm surprised. Another nail in the Verisign coffin.
it's not nearly that simple.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (John Neiberger) added:
By the way, do we even know what we're talking about? Specifically, has
VeriSign produced a set of specifications for exactly what SiteFinder is and
does?
For example, is it guaranteed to return the same A record for all
unregistered domains? Is it guaranteed that that A record
The lawsuit is not premature to the extent that
1. VRSN were told (however justly) to cease and desist Site Finder 1.0 or
else face consequences.
2. VRSN were told they couldn't implement the Consolidate service
without making other concessions [according to the complaint the service
allowed
Scott Call wrote:
On Thu, 26 Feb 2004, Roman Volf wrote:
When are they up for renewal exactly?
November 10, 2007, according to
http://www.icann.org/tlds/agreements/verisign/registry-agmt-com-25may01.htm
-S
I think as far as Verisign is concerned, they might not be an ongoing
concern in
By the way, do we even know what we're talking about?
that is not needed to flame folk such as verisign. lynch mobs
look pretty good until you are the one on guantanamo.
randy
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (william(at)elan.net) writes:
...
And based on that Verisign rule over these tlds ends in November 2007
no. See page 19 of:
http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/delivery.cfm/SSRN_ID475281_code70168.pdf?abstractid=475281
i think that verisign and icann are stuck with each other, in
On Thu, 26 Feb 2004, John Kinsella wrote:
When are they up for renewal exactly?
November 10, 2007, according
Any way to speed that up? ;)
http://www.icann.org/tlds/agreements/verisign/registry-agmt-com-25may01.htm
16. Termination
...
B. In the event of termination by DOC of its
Any way to speed that up? ;)
John
On Thu, Feb 26, 2004 at 03:57:12PM -0800, Scott Call wrote:
On Thu, 26 Feb 2004, Roman Volf wrote:
When are they up for renewal exactly?
November 10, 2007, according to
http://www.icann.org/tlds/agreements/verisign/registry-agmt-com-25may01.htm
For ICANN/Registry agreements see here:
http://www.icann.org/registries/agreements.htm
Specific agreements all technical specs Verisign agreed to follow:
http://www.icann.org/tlds/agreements/verisign/com-index.htm
http://www.icann.org/tlds/agreements/verisign/net-index.htm
And based on
When are they up for renewal exactly?
william(at)elan.net wrote:
On Thu, 26 Feb 2004, Deepak Jain wrote:
Since no one else has mentioned this:
http://biz.yahoo.com/rc/040226/tech_verisign_2.html
And I'm sure ICANN will remember it for long time - right up to the point
when Verisign's
On Thu, 26 Feb 2004, Deepak Jain wrote:
Since no one else has mentioned this:
http://biz.yahoo.com/rc/040226/tech_verisign_2.html
And I'm sure ICANN will remember it for long time - right up to the point
when Verisign's contracts for .com/.net management are up for renewal.
--
William
Neil J. McRae [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2/26/04 3:03:52 PM
http://biz.yahoo.com/rc/040226/tech_verisign_2.html
can't say I'm surprised. Another nail in the Verisign coffin.
They must have taken a page from the recently-released book How to Shoot Your Company
in the Foot, by SCO.
*
John
--
The
Since no one else has mentioned this:
http://biz.yahoo.com/rc/040226/tech_verisign_2.html
On Tue, 10 Feb 2004, williamatelan.net wrote:
The United States is a republic, not a democracy. There's a huge
difference.
Are you well enough versed in the political science to define and
understand the differences? If you're you'll know that there is no and
never been any true
Sorry for barging in to this fine mailing list like this; long time reader,
first time contributor.
We, as the Internet engineering community, have made a great mistake.
Actually, it wasn't even one large mistake, but a series of small ones.
Engineers are busy people, and most us work under the
On Tue, 10 Feb 2004, David Monosov wrote:
where there is power, there are struggles to take control over that power,
and exploit it. This is apparently one of the beauties of democratic
capitalism (under which I will be so bold to presume many of us live).
The United States is a republic,
On Tue, 10 Feb 2004, David Monosov wrote:
where there is power, there are struggles to take control over that power,
and exploit it. This is apparently one of the beauties of democratic
capitalism (under which I will be so bold to presume many of us live).
The United States is a
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (David Monosov) writes:
...
Root servers, and the .net, .com (as well as .org) domains belong to the
world now; Welcome to the global democracy, brought to you by the ability
to send packets across the globe at the speed of light. We all rely on
them, and their management
26 matches
Mail list logo
