[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Marco d'Itri) writes:
On May 24, Suresh Ramasubramanian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Fastweb seems to think 41/8 is a dsl pool for its users in Turin
Indeed. But that list is a bit old, they are also using 59/8 (in use
in the APNIC region) and a few private DoD networks like
Bjørn Mork wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Marco d'Itri) writes:
On May 24, Suresh Ramasubramanian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Fastweb seems to think 41/8 is a dsl pool for its users in Turin
Indeed. But that list is a bit old, they are also using 59/8 (in use
in the APNIC region) and
http://plany.fasthosting.it/dbmap.asp?table=Mappatura
I take it that this means we can use any ip range allocated to Fastweb
as if it were RFC1918 space, including the necessary border filters?
I'd personally contract to build a moat around their NOC for Homeland
Security reasons using
On May 24, Suresh Ramasubramanian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Fastweb seems to think 41/8 is a dsl pool for its users in Turin
Indeed. But that list is a bit old, they are also using 59/8 (in use
in the APNIC region) and a few private DoD networks like 26/8 and 29/8:
On 5/22/06, Mikisa Richard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anyone from FASTWEB please get back to me offline.
This page for fastweb (from an ISP in Africa) plus Ernest / Afrinic's
post asking people to update bogon filters for 41/8 .. both related.
Reason - fastweb provides NAT'ted ADSL lines to
Anyone from FASTWEB please get back to me offline.
--
Richard
