How about INOC-DBA, which is supposed to have a clue threshold you
obtained an ASN by some means in order to have a dial-by-asn phone.
Obtaining an ASN isn't much of a clue threshold.
However, obtaining an ASN is a volume threshold which
is far more important to the people on the
] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Christopher L. Morrow
Sent: Friday, February 03, 2006 4:31 PM
To: Richard A Steenbergen
Cc: Sean Donelan; nanog@merit.edu
Subject: Re: Anyone heard of INOC-DBA?
On Fri, 3 Feb 2006, Richard A Steenbergen wrote:
And then of course
On Sat, 4 Feb 2006, Henry Linneweh wrote:
The only reference I see to this, is this non profit
research org
www.pch.net/inoc-dba/
and a Nanog reference page to the same thing
http://www.nanog.org/mtg-0505/upadhaya.html
that would be it... I'm sure that, aside from the presentation and
] On
Behalf Of Christopher L. Morrow
Sent: Friday, February 03, 2006 4:31 PM
To: Richard A Steenbergen
Cc: Sean Donelan; nanog@merit.edu
Subject: Re: Anyone heard of INOC-DBA?
On Fri, 3 Feb 2006, Richard A Steenbergen wrote:
And then of course there is that whole using
Something I (unless skipped) didn't see being mentioned in the former
threads was: http://www.peeringdb.com, although meant for peerings it
does contain quite a large number of direct links/phones to various
NOC's and a lot of other very useful information.
On Fri, 2006-02-03 at 15:59 -0500,
On Sat, 4 Feb 2006, Jeroen Massar wrote:
Maybe the RIR's should keep a Free VoIP phone with each ASN special?
NIC.BR, the Brazilian NIR, does exactly that... they've given out about
200 INOC-DBA phones with ASNs in the last three years. NetNod does the
same in Sweden, and the WAIA
On Sat, 4 Feb 2006, Henry Linneweh wrote:
The only reference I see to this, is this non profit
research org
www.pch.net/inoc-dba/
and a Nanog reference page to the same thing
http://www.nanog.org/mtg-0505/upadhaya.html
Yes, those are correct URLs. Quite a few SBC
I believe SBC was one of the pilot users in 1993.
using what protocol set?
randy
I believe SBC was one of the pilot users in 1993.
using what protocol set?
Sorry, 2003.
-Bill
On Fri, 3 Feb 2006, Richard A Steenbergen wrote:
Until someone invents a universally recognized system where you can call
and say Hi I'm CCIE #12345, I'm certified to know what I'm talking about
and I have an actual network issue, please transfer me to someone with
clue, we're going to
On 2/3/06, Sean Donelan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How about INOC-DBA, which is supposed to have a clue threshold you
obtained an ASN by some means in order to have a dial-by-asn phone.
Obtaining an ASN isn't much of a clue threshold.
On Feb 3, 2006, at 2:57 PM, Aaron Glenn wrote:
On 2/3/06, Sean Donelan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How about INOC-DBA, which is supposed to have a clue threshold you
obtained an ASN by some means in order to have a dial-by-asn phone.
Obtaining an ASN isn't much of a clue threshold.
Knowing
On Fri, Feb 03, 2006 at 03:08:27PM -0500, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
On Feb 3, 2006, at 2:57 PM, Aaron Glenn wrote:
On 2/3/06, Sean Donelan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How about INOC-DBA, which is supposed to have a clue threshold you
obtained an ASN by some means in order to have a
On Feb 3, 2006, at 2:57 PM, Aaron Glenn wrote:
On 2/3/06, Sean Donelan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How about INOC-DBA, which is supposed to have a clue threshold you
obtained an ASN by some means in order to have a dial-by-asn phone.
Obtaining an ASN isn't much of a clue threshold.
If
On Fri, Feb 03, 2006 at 02:34:16PM -0500, Sean Donelan wrote:
On Fri, 3 Feb 2006, Richard A Steenbergen wrote:
Until someone invents a universally recognized system where you can call
and say Hi I'm CCIE #12345, I'm certified to know what I'm talking about
and I have an actual network
On Fri, 3 Feb 2006, Aaron Glenn wrote:
On 2/3/06, Sean Donelan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How about INOC-DBA, which is supposed to have a clue threshold you
obtained an ASN by some means in order to have a dial-by-asn phone.
Obtaining an ASN isn't much of a clue threshold.
No...and
On 3-Feb-2006, at 15:59, Richard A Steenbergen wrote:
With all due respect to the INOC-DBA project, which is actually
somewhat
interesting (from a I want to play with free IP phones too
perspective
if nothing else), it isn't a workable solution to operational contacts
yet.
I think you
On Fri, 3 Feb 2006, Richard A Steenbergen wrote:
And then of course there is that whole using the IP network to contact
someone about an IP network issue thing that doesn't seem terribly well
thought out... Admittedly I haven't looked at the INOC-DBA stuff in a
while, there could have been
18 matches
Mail list logo
