Re: Boing Boing: Michael Lynn's controversial Cisco security presentation

On Sat, 30 Jul 2005, Brad Knowles wrote: > BTW, the original slides are supposed to be at > . However, what's > there now is currently a place-holder, although it does tell you that if > you're looking for the original PDF file that y

Re: Boing Boing: Michael Lynn's controversial Cisco security presentation

> > I guess at this point ISS realizes their reputation is so deep in the > > shitter that nothing they do could make it worse. > > Give it a week. :) > > (It's obvious that the people calling the shots in this circus have either > never heard of "Skylarov", "deCSS", or "@Stake/Dan Geer", or ha

Re: Boing Boing: Michael Lynn's controversial Cisco security presentation

On Fri, 29 Jul 2005 23:16:39 PDT, Dan Hollis said: > I guess at this point ISS realizes their reputation is so deep in the > shitter that nothing they do could make it worse. Give it a week. :) (It's obvious that the people calling the shots in this circus have either never heard of "Skylarov",

Re: Boing Boing: Michael Lynn's controversial Cisco security presentation

On Sat, 30 Jul 2005, Simon Lyall wrote: > On Sat, 30 Jul 2005, Brad Knowles wrote: > > BTW, the original slides are supposed to be at > > . However, > > what's there now is currently a place-holder, although it does tell > > you that if

Re: Boing Boing: Michael Lynn's controversial Cisco security presentation

On Sat, 30 Jul 2005, Brad Knowles wrote: > BTW, the original slides are supposed to be at > . However, > what's there now is currently a place-holder, although it does tell > you that if you're looking for the original PDF file that yo

Re: Boing Boing: Michael Lynn's controversial Cisco security presentation

At 6:44 PM +0200 2005-07-29, Brad Knowles wrote: At 2:19 PM + 2005-07-29, Fergie (Paul Ferguson) wrote: http://www.boingboing.net/2005/07/29/michael_lynns_contro.html I think these guys better prepare for the "slashdot effect"... BTW, the original slides are supposed to be at

Re: Boing Boing: Michael Lynn's controversial Cisco security presentation

At 2:19 PM + 2005-07-29, Fergie (Paul Ferguson) wrote: http://www.boingboing.net/2005/07/29/michael_lynns_contro.html I think these guys better prepare for the "slashdot effect"... The guys at cryptome.org have a long history of archiving documents that others in the business have fo

Re: Boing Boing: Michael Lynn's controversial Cisco security presentation

On Fri, Jul 29, 2005 at 08:56:40AM -0700, Buhrmaster, Gary wrote: > I know, I am just being paranoid. There has never > been an exploitable PDF exploit. Oh, wait, there > has been :-) Ah, yes; but does it affect xpdf? Cheers, -- jra -- Jay R. Ashworth

RE: Boing Boing: Michael Lynn's controversial Cisco security presentation

nd technical exploit if it could be pulled off. Gary > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Fergie (Paul Ferguson) > Sent: Friday, July 29, 2005 7:19 AM > To: nanog@merit.edu > Subject: Boing Boing: Michael Lynn's c

Boing Boing: Michael Lynn's controversial Cisco security presentation

Over on Boing Boing: [snip] Here's a PDF that purports to be Michael Lynn's presentation on Cisco's critical vulnerabilities ("The Holy Grail: Cisco IOS Shellcode And Exploitation Techniques"), delivered at last week's Black Hat conference. Lynn's employer, ISS, wouldn't let him deliver the