Re: Cisco IPv6 Exploit, was Re: 6to4 routes disappeared from most of North America

2005-07-30 Thread Todd Vierling
On Sat, 30 Jul 2005, Robert Boyle wrote: > > Naah. My money's on laziness; it's usually the case. 8-) > > Never attribute to laziness that which can be explained by incompetence. :) Or both, simultaneously. -- -- Todd Vierling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: Cisco IPv6 Exploit, was Re: 6to4 routes disappeared from most of North America

2005-07-29 Thread Robert Boyle
At 11:20 PM 7/29/2005, you wrote: Naah. My money's on laziness; it's usually the case. 8-) Never attribute to laziness that which can be explained by incompetence. :) R Tellurian Networks - The Ultimate Internet Connection http://www.tellurian.com | 888-TELLURIAN | 973-300-9211 "Well

Re: Cisco IPv6 Exploit, was Re: 6to4 routes disappeared from most of North America

2005-07-29 Thread Todd Vierling
On Fri, 29 Jul 2005, John Neiberger wrote: > Someone on another list was wondering if this IPv6 exploit might have > something to do with the NANOG thread from a few days ago titled "6to4 > routes disappeared from most of North America". > > http://www.merit.edu/mail.archives/nanog/msg09747.html

Cisco IPv6 Exploit, was Re: 6to4 routes disappeared from most of North America

2005-07-29 Thread John Neiberger
Someone on another list was wondering if this IPv6 exploit might have something to do with the NANOG thread from a few days ago titled "6to4 routes disappeared from most of North America". http://www.merit.edu/mail.archives/nanog/msg09747.html Is there any reason to think that these might be rel