Thanks very much for this link (and the summary). I see an interesting
(if not surprising) trend in Advertised AS Count. Up until 2001 it was
accelerating... and after 2001 its stayed linear. However, unadvertised
AS count which was basically stagnant has increased markedly before
then.
14 October 2010
http://www.potaroo.net/tools/asns/
Thanks very much for this link (and the summary). I see an interesting
(if not surprising) trend in Advertised AS Count. Up until 2001 it was
accelerating... and after 2001 its stayed linear. However, unadvertised
AS count which was
At 01:06 PM 30/11/2006, Deepak Jain wrote:
Does anyone have a current projection of when AS# (16 bit) exhaust will occur?
14 October 2010
http://www.potaroo.net/tools/asns/
regards,
Geoff
On 11/29/06, Deepak Jain [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Afraid so. I'm hoping to be out of the industry before calls for 128 bit
AS#s come down the pipe and people (at that time) are laughing about how
silly 32 bit AS#s seem.
I hope to be long dead before we exhaust 4 billion ASNs. If I'm
still
Seems relevant.
Begin forwarded message:
From: IESG Secretary [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: November 29, 2006 10:32:38 AM EST
To: IETF Announcement list ietf-announce@ietf.org
Subject: The IESG Approved the Expansion of the AS Number Registry
Original Message
Subject: The IESG
Afraid so. I'm hoping to be out of the industry before calls for 128 bit
AS#s come down the pipe and people (at that time) are laughing about how
silly 32 bit AS#s seem.
Does anyone have a current projection of when AS# (16 bit) exhaust will
occur?
Thanks,
Deepak
Marshall Eubanks
On Wed, 29 Nov 2006, Deepak Jain wrote:
Afraid so. I'm hoping to be out of the industry before calls for 128 bit
AS#s come down the pipe and people (at that time) are laughing about how
silly 32 bit AS#s seem.
Does anyone have a current projection of when AS# (16 bit) exhaust will