General question on rfc1918

2007-11-13 Thread Drew Weaver
Hi there, I just had a real quick question. I hope this is found to be on topic. Is it to be expected to see rfc1918 src'd packets coming from transit carriers? We have filters in place on our edge (obviously) but should we be seeing traffic from 192.168.0.0 and 10.0.0.0 et cetera

Re: General question on rfc1918

2007-11-13 Thread Joe Abley
On 13-Nov-2007, at 10:08, Drew Weaver wrote: Hi there, I just had a real quick question. I hope this is found to be on topic. Is it to be expected to see rfc1918 src'd packets coming from transit carriers? You should not send packets with RFC1918 source or destination

RE: General question on rfc1918

2007-11-13 Thread Darden, Patrick S.
limited to [public IP addresses] Make sense? --Patrick Darden --Internetworking Manager --ARMC -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Drew Weaver Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2007 10:09 AM To: nanog@merit.edu Subject: General question on rfc1918

Re: General question on rfc1918

2007-11-13 Thread Justin M. Streiner
On Tue, 13 Nov 2007, Drew Weaver wrote: Hi there, I just had a real quick question. I hope this is found to be on topic. Is it to be expected to see rfc1918 src'd packets coming from transit carriers? I would recommend grilling your carriers to find out why they're not dropping packets

Re: General question on rfc1918

2007-11-13 Thread Joe Greco
Hi there, I just had a real quick question. I hope this is found to be on topic. Is it to be expected to see rfc1918 src'd packets coming from transit carriers? We have filters in place on our edge (obviously) but should we be seeing traffic from 192.168.0.0 and 10.0.0.0 et

Re: General question on rfc1918

2007-11-13 Thread Robert Bonomi
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Nov 13 09:12:04 2007 Cc: nanog@merit.edu nanog@merit.edu From: Joe Abley [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Drew Weaver [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: General question on rfc1918 Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2007 10:10:26 -0500 On 13-Nov-2007, at 10:08, Drew Weaver wrote

Re: General question on rfc1918

2007-11-13 Thread Joe Abley
On 13-Nov-2007, at 10:35, Robert Bonomi wrote: On 13-Nov-2007, at 10:08, Drew Weaver wrote: Hi there, I just had a real quick question. I hope this is found to be on topic. Is it to be expected to see rfc1918 src'd packets coming from transit carriers? You should not send packets

RE: General question on rfc1918

2007-11-13 Thread Drew Weaver
On Tue, 13 Nov 2007, Drew Weaver wrote: Hi there, I just had a real quick question. I hope this is found to be on topic. Is it to be expected to see rfc1918 src'd packets coming from transit carriers? I would recommend grilling your carriers to find out why they're not dropping packets

Re: General question on rfc1918

2007-11-13 Thread Sean Donelan
On Tue, 13 Nov 2007, Drew Weaver wrote: Is it to be expected to see rfc1918 src'd packets coming from transit carriers? Yes. Any ISP which uses RFC1918 on internal links may generate various ICMP error packets (e.g. traceroute/TTL expire, PMTU discovery/Fragmentation required, etc) from

Re: General question on rfc1918

2007-11-13 Thread Phil Regnauld
Joe Abley (jabley) writes: You drop the packet at your border before it is sent out to the Internet. This is why numbering interfaces in the data path of non-internal traffic is a bad idea. Unfortunately many providers have the bad habit of using RFC1918 for