: [EMAIL PROTECTED], andrew matthews [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Graphing Peering
I'm not registerred to post on nanog.
You may send this info in, with or without quoting me..
On Thu, 20 Jan 2005, Daniel Golding wrote:
Andrew,
The 32 bit counters are a significant problem when using gigabit
On Jan 19, 1:41pm, andrew matthews [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anyone have any suggestions on graphing peering on a cisco router? I'm
using mrtg and i did mac address accounting but the numbers are off.
If you don't mind a reasonably inexpensive commercial solution, BENTO
does exactly what you
On Wed, 2005-01-19 at 22:41, andrew matthews wrote:
Anyone have any suggestions on graphing peering on a cisco router? I'm
using mrtg and i did mac address accounting but the numbers are off.
off in what sense? We use mac-accounting, snmp nad mrtg to graph per
peer utilization. The following
Take a look at http://jffnms.sourceforge.net
According to the Author whom I know very well it will do exactly what
you need it to do:
---SNIP---
Yes, JFFNMS has a specific system to do this.
Using MAC Accounting, we track each MAC address, using ARP its IP, and using
.
- Dan
on 1/20/05 9:45 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 2005-01-19 at 22:41, andrew matthews wrote:
Anyone have any suggestions on graphing peering on a cisco router? I'm
using mrtg and i did mac address accounting but the numbers are off.
off in what sense? We
Anyone have any suggestions on graphing peering on a cisco router? I'm
using mrtg and i did mac address accounting but the numbers are off.
Thank i appreciate it in advance.
Andrew
have any suggestions on graphing peering on a cisco router? I'm
using mrtg and i did mac address accounting but the numbers are off.
do you mean how to graph traffic to each host on a lan..?
what platform do you have?
Steve
matthews [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 19, 2005 4:38 PM
To: nanog@merit.edu
Subject: Re: Graphing Peering
no i mean graph bgp sessions...
it's a single interface, and i want to graph every bgp session so i can
see how much traffic i'm doing between each peer.
On Wed, 19 Jan
to graph every bgp session so i
can see how much traffic i'm doing between each peer.
On Wed, 19 Jan 2005 22:25:37 + (GMT), Stephen J. Wilcox
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 19 Jan 2005, andrew matthews wrote:
Anyone have any suggestions on graphing peering on a cisco router? I'm
using mrtg
a single interface, and i want to graph every bgp session so i
can see how much traffic i'm doing between each peer.
On Wed, 19 Jan 2005 22:25:37 + (GMT), Stephen J. Wilcox
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 19 Jan 2005, andrew matthews wrote:
Anyone have any suggestions on graphing
each peer.
On Wed, 19 Jan 2005 22:25:37 + (GMT), Stephen J. Wilcox
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 19 Jan 2005, andrew matthews wrote:
Anyone have any suggestions on graphing peering on a cisco router? I'm
using mrtg and i did mac address accounting but the numbers are off.
do you mean how
PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 19 Jan 2005, andrew matthews wrote:
Anyone have any suggestions on graphing peering on a cisco router? I'm
using mrtg and i did mac address accounting but the numbers are off.
do you mean how to graph traffic to each host on a lan..?
what platform
On Wed, 19 Jan 2005, andrew matthews wrote:
Well with mac accounting i've found that the results are not correct
number they have to multiplied or something.
I have a GigE and it has multiple peering sessions on it. Flowscan
can't keep up, i have to export it in samples and that just
On Thu, Jan 20, 2005 at 03:14:24AM +, Christopher L. Morrow wrote:
On Wed, 19 Jan 2005, andrew matthews wrote:
Well with mac accounting i've found that the results are not correct
number they have to multiplied or something.
I have a GigE and it has multiple peering sessions
On Wed, 19 Jan 2005 14:37:54 -0800, andrew matthews [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
no i mean graph bgp sessions...
it's a single interface, and i want to graph every bgp session so i
can see how much traffic i'm doing between each peer.
If you are looking to graph statistics about the BGP peering
15 matches
Mail list logo