Hi Christopher,
Christopher J. Wolff wrote:
Jane,
This brings up a good point about IM. IMHO, IM is a security risk and I am
establishing a company standard where users behind the firewall are
prohibited from using IM, IRC, and peer-to-peer file sharing programs. My
opinion is that
On Wed, 26 Jun 2002, Rizzo Frank wrote:
: Chris,
:
: By IM I assume you're referring to Instant Messaging as an ideal, not
: any particular protocol or vendor implementation. Which begs the
: question, is IM is a risk because Christopher J. Wolff, VP CIO a
: self-proclaimed tier 1 provider,
Thus spake Scott Weeks [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Your proprietary information is on someone else's server and it's up to
them not to 'use' it.
There are IM products which a company can set up internally for exactly this
reason. For public IM servers, you're not obligated to give proprietary
On Wed, 26 Jun 2002, Stephen Sprunk wrote:
: Thus spake Scott Weeks [EMAIL PROTECTED]
: Your proprietary information is on someone else's server and it's up to
: them not to 'use' it.
:
: There are IM products which a company can set up internally for exactly this
: reason. For public IM
On Tue, Jun 25, 2002 at 12:16:48PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
[snip]
This brings up a good point about IM. IMHO, IM is a security risk and I am
establishing a company standard where users behind the firewall are
prohibited from using IM, IRC, and peer-to-peer file sharing programs. My
On Tue, Jun 25, 2002 at 11:33:55PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Doug Barton wrote:
Would a secure (probably via SSL) chat client be considered a valuable
item in this sphere? (Note, blatant self interest involved in this
question, feel free to respond off list.)
Jabber can do SSL for
Jane,
This brings up a good point about IM. IMHO, IM is a security risk and I am
establishing a company standard where users behind the firewall are
prohibited from using IM, IRC, and peer-to-peer file sharing programs. My
opinion is that these types of programs contribute more to lack of
On Tue, 25 Jun 2002, Christopher J. Wolff wrote:
So my question for the group is, do chat programs (IM, IRC, yahoo) serve a
substantial network support purpose or are they more of a distraction,
allowing staff to communicate with friends, relatives, drifters, interlopers
on company time?
We
So my question for the group is, do chat programs (IM, IRC, yahoo) serve
a substantial network support purpose or are they more of a distraction,
allowing staff to communicate with friends, relatives, drifters,
interlopers on company time?
I disagree. I have spent many hours in a noisy
On Tuesday 25 June 2002 12:16 pm, Christopher J. Wolff wrote:
Jane,
This brings up a good point about IM. IMHO, IM is a security risk and I
am establishing a company standard where users behind the firewall are
prohibited from using IM, IRC, and peer-to-peer file sharing programs.
My
PGP Corporate Desktop can help with ICQ if you are a Windows user.
-ren, who prefers IRC
At 12:24 PM 6/25/2002 -0700, Dan Hollis wrote:
On Tue, 25 Jun 2002, Christopher J. Wolff wrote:
So my question for the group is, do chat programs (IM, IRC, yahoo) serve a
substantial network support
there may effect your operations.
- Daniel Golding
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Christopher J. Wolff
Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 3:17 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: How important is IM? was RE: How important is the PSTN
Jane
Title: RE: How important is IM? was RE: How important is the PSTN
-Original Message-
From: Christopher J. Wolff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 3:17 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: How important is IM? was RE: How important is the PSTN
So my question
On Tue, 25 Jun 2002, Dan Hollis wrote:
On Tue, 25 Jun 2002, Christopher J. Wolff wrote:
So my question for the group is, do chat programs (IM, IRC, yahoo) serve a
substantial network support purpose or are they more of a distraction,
allowing staff to communicate with friends,
-Original Message-
From: Jason Lewis
Instead of banning, you should be looking into a secure IM client.
Several companies make secure clients that also link up to the major
players via a gateway.
Trillian is a combined (AIM, Y!, ICQ, IRC) client that supports secure
direct P2P
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 3:17 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: How important is IM? was RE: How important is the PSTN
Jane,
This brings up a good point about IM. IMHO, IM is a
security risk and I am establishing
On Tue, 25 Jun 2002, ren wrote:
: PGP Corporate Desktop can help with ICQ if you are a Windows user.
: -ren, who prefers IRC
Not for long...
http://zdnet.com.com/2100-1107-851515.html
A week ago, on Feb. 26, Network Associates (NAI) sent an e-mail to
some of its customers
. Wolff
: Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 3:17 PM
: To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
: Subject: How important is IM? was RE: How important is the PSTN
:
:
:
: Jane,
:
: This brings up a good point about IM. IMHO, IM is a security
: risk and I am
: establishing a company standard where users behind
18 matches
Mail list logo
