On 27-Feb-2008, at 15:09, Mark Smith wrote:
Don't worry if the ISOC website times out, their firewall isn't TCP
ECN compatible.
Isn't it the case in the real world that the Internet isn't TCP ECN
compatible?
I thought people had relegated that to the nice idea but, in
practice, waste
On Thu, 28 Feb 2008 08:41:27 -0500
Joe Abley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 27-Feb-2008, at 15:09, Mark Smith wrote:
Don't worry if the ISOC website times out, their firewall isn't TCP
ECN compatible.
Isn't it the case in the real world that the Internet isn't TCP ECN
compatible?
Isn't it the case in the real world that the Internet isn't TCP ECN
compatible?
actually, no. ecn compat is increasing, happy to say.
Randy Bush wrote:
Isn't it the case in the real world that the Internet isn't TCP ECN
compatible?
actually, no. ecn compat is increasing, happy to say.
Hopefully the number of people with 8 year old pix firewall software is
not...
All -
Forwarded on Mirjam's behalf.
Aside: If you find the Thaler/Aboba article on protocol success
interesting you might also want to check out the plenary slides
from the last IETF:
http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/07dec/slides/plenaryt-1.pdf
- Lucy
-- Forwarded message --
Don't worry if the ISOC website times out, their firewall isn't TCP
ECN compatible. It was going to be fixed a couple of years ago when I
enquired about it, but obviously hasn't been. Being liberal in what
they'll accept seems to be a bit of a problem for them.
It's the last remaining non-ECN
