On Nov 13, 2006, at 9:20 AM, chuck goolsbee wrote:
[SNIP]
** I assume it is myth, but I've never heard anyone from Google
make any statements that definitively debunks it. Debunking this
pervasive among webmasters and SEO Experts myth sure would be a
very UN-evil thing to do if true
On Tue, 14 Nov 2006, Warren Kumari wrote:
On Nov 13, 2006, at 9:20 AM, chuck goolsbee wrote:
It pisses me off to no end when a sales guy comes to me with a
request from a customer for a /20 for a half-rack of web servers.
The justification ALWAYS comes down to this inane search engine
The myth that I've heard relates to links. From the comments on Matt's blog:
500 sites under the same IP interlinked in some way will provide the same
benefit as 500 sites on uniques similarly interlinked all other things held
constant?
The answer to this question almost has to be no. A
At 9:50 AM -0800 11/14/06, Warren Kumari wrote:
On Nov 13, 2006, at 9:20 AM, chuck goolsbee wrote:
** I assume it is myth, but I've never heard anyone from Google make any
statements that definitively debunks it. Debunking this pervasive among
webmasters and SEO Experts myth sure would be a
On 11/13/06, chuck goolsbee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It pisses me off to no end when a sales guy comes to me with a
request from a customer for a /20 for a half-rack of web servers. The
justification ALWAYS comes down to this inane search engine
optimization pipe dream. =\
No, no, it's
On Mon, Nov 13, 2006 at 09:20:38AM -0800, chuck goolsbee wrote:
It pisses me off to no end when a sales guy comes to me with a
request from a customer for a /20 for a half-rack of web servers. The
justification ALWAYS comes down to this inane search engine
optimization pipe dream. =\
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of David Hubbard
Sent: Monday, November 13, 2006 11:42 AM
To: nanog@merit.edu
Subject: RE: IP adresss management verification
What I meant was we require a technical justification to
give
Hi,
I'm curious on how regional RIR which allocates ip address, verifies the
usage pattern info provided by their members in their application process.
Especially ISP requesting for additional allocations (80% utilization, adhered
policies etc). Thanks.
Regards,
Kana
I'm curious on how regional RIR which allocates ip address, verifies
the
usage pattern info provided by their members in their application
process.
It's quite simple, really.
They ask for it.
If the iformation that you provided with your application
does not answer their questions,
At 10:35 PM +0800 11/13/06, Kanagaraj Krishna wrote:
Hi,
I'm curious on how regional RIR which allocates ip address, verifies the
usage pattern info provided by their members in their application process.
Same as other most other filings: A signed and notarized statement from a
company
Michael's answer is clear enough,
and my simplest answer is ask APNIC.
John's more interesting question is also mine ;-) .
Regards,
MAEMURA Akinori
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: IP adresss management verification
John Curran [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
|
| At 10:35 PM +0800 11
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
It's quite simple, really.
They ask for it.
If the iformation that you provided with your application
does not answer their questions, they ask you for more
information. I assume that all the RIRs will sign an
NDA with you, certainly ARIN does this. ARIN may
On Mon, 13 Nov 2006 10:36:44 EST, John Curran said:
A more interesting question might be: How does the community think an
RIR should best verify information in the application process today, and
should that change as we approach the IPv4 event horizon?
I think the current ARIN policies are
They ask for it.
Is the policy still that dedicated IP addresses for web
hosts *should* only be used when technical justification
exists? I really wish it would change to a requirement
as we very frequently get new hosting customers who get
angry when they find their site that doesn't
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
SSL is a technical justification for separate IP
addresses for web hosts. Virtual servers is another
technical justification for assigning multiple IP
addresses to a single physical server.
What I meant was we require a technical justification to
give a dedicated IP
At some point, it will become cheaper to just deploy IPv6 than to do the
things needed to get more IPv4 space.
What's this week's forcast for the event horizon, anyhow? It keeps moving
around
That's what I'd like to know. Is the DoD deadline going to motivate
anyone? When are we going to
At 10:36 -0500 11/13/06, John Curran wrote:
A more interesting question might be: How does the community think an
RIR should best verify information in the application process today, and
should that change as we approach the IPv4 event horizon?
IRIS. ;)
ARIN is in a tricky place. It has
At 11:41 AM -0500 11/13/06, David Hubbard wrote:
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
SSL is a technical justification for separate IP
addresses for web hosts. Virtual servers is another
technical justification for assigning multiple IP
addresses to a single physical server.
What I meant was we
From: chuck goolsbee
** I assume it is myth, but I've never heard anyone from Google make
any statements that definitively debunks it. Debunking this pervasive
among webmasters and SEO Experts myth sure would be a very UN-evil
thing to do if true (Hint hint you Google-folk!)
Actually
19 matches
Mail list logo
