A company I work with (who's servers are located in the San Jose, CA)
is
looking to setup some backup servers at a datacenter whose connectivity
and
location is off any faultline, or away from other malady, that
mighteffect its
main servers datacenter or connectivity. Problem is, they
Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Alistair Cockeram
Sent: 17 July 2004 22:59
To: Stephen J. Wilcox
Cc: Tom (UnitedLayer); David Lesher; nanog list
Subject: Re: Looking for recommendations for Datacenter off CA Faultline
On Sat, Jul 17, 2004 at 08:11:53PM +0100
Not exactly a plug as it is in a different area, but SpringNet offers colo
underground. And everything is underground including generator and
cooling towers. A division of the municipal utility so power is pretty
good also.
Todd Christell
Network Manager
SpringNet
www.springnet.net
Lots of stuff from Wall Street Financial houses set up their backups in
Kansas City.
There's a nice little data center in Portsmouth, NH. I used to work
there. http://www.worldpath.net (8 hours away by most airlines.) :-)
Curtis
--
Curtis Maurand
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Speaking on Deep Background, the Press Secretary whispered:
Lots of stuff from Wall Street Financial houses set up their backups in
Kansas City.
Is there a backup site in those KC limestone mines?
Only thing is, where's the New Madrid fault?
--
A host is a host from coast to
David Lesher [EMAIL PROTECTED], wrote:
Speaking on Deep Background, the Press Secretary whispered:
Lots of stuff from Wall Street Financial houses set up their backups in
Kansas City.
Is there a backup site in those KC limestone mines?
Only thing is, where's the New Madrid
On Fri, 16 Jul 2004 21:00:32 EDT, David Lesher [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
location is off any faultline, or away from other malady, that might effect
its
main servers datacenter or connectivity. Problem is, they also want them as
physically close as possible.
http://www.havenco.com/
On Fri, 16 Jul 2004, David Lesher wrote:
http://www.havenco.com/
http://chris.nodewarrior.org/reviews/DefCon11/Lackey.html
Does anyone actually know of any machines hosted on HMS Roughs[1]?
www.havenco.com is not, it appears. Of the 3/4 NSes listed in whois
for havenco.com, only two are
On Fri, 16 Jul 2004, David Lesher wrote:
http://www.havenco.com/
Havenco is a shell of what it once was, and about 75-90% of what it says
on the website isn't true anymore which is sad.
If you're really keen on former british millitary installations turned
colo, there's a company that sells
On Sat, 17 Jul 2004, Tom (UnitedLayer) wrote:
On Fri, 16 Jul 2004, David Lesher wrote:
http://www.havenco.com/
Havenco is a shell of what it once was, and about 75-90% of what it says
on the website isn't true anymore which is sad.
If you're really keen on former british millitary
On Sat, Jul 17, 2004 at 08:11:53PM +0100, Stephen J. Wilcox wrote:
On Fri, 16 Jul 2004, David Lesher wrote:
If you're really keen on former british millitary installations turned
colo, there's a company that sells colo in bunkers in the UK :)
If we're thinking of the same company its
Hello all.
A company I work with (who's servers are located in the San Jose, CA) is
looking to setup some backup servers at a datacenter whose connectivity and
location is off any faultline, or away from other malady, that might effect its
main servers datacenter or connectivity. Problem is,
A company I work with (who's servers are located in the San Jose,
CA) is looking to setup some backup servers at a datacenter whose
connectivity and location is off any faultline, or away from other
malady, that might effect its main servers datacenter or
connectivity. Problem is, they also
Might anyone have any recommendations for datacenters and or ways I can best
determine this?
It does me no good to go to a datacenter whose connectivity also comes
from the same peeing points or fiber that would be effected or take down a
data center in South Bay. Despite being off faultline.
You mean that they're not near any *known* fault lines. Remember
Northridge?
If you're in CA or NV, you *are* near a fault line, no matter where you
are.
http://quake.wr.usgs.gov/recenteqs/Maps/122-39.htm
http://quake.wr.usgs.gov/recenteqs/latest.htm
Tony
On Jul 16, 2004, at 3:53 PM,
Sacramento
-joe
On 7/16/04 4:34 PM, Tony Li [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You mean that they're not near any *known* fault lines. Remember
Northridge?
If you're in CA or NV, you *are* near a fault line, no matter where you
are.
http://quake.wr.usgs.gov/recenteqs/Maps/122-39.htm
Nicole wrote:
A company I work with (who's servers are located in the San Jose, CA) is
looking to setup some backup servers at a datacenter whose connectivity and
location is off any faultline, or away from other malady, that might effect its
main servers datacenter or connectivity. Problem is,
Speaking on Deep Background, the Press Secretary whispered:
Hello all.
A company I work with (who's servers are located in the San Jose, CA) is
looking to setup some backup servers at a datacenter whose connectivity and
location is off any faultline, or away from other malady, that
Jonathan Nichols
www.ragingwire.com
Their data center is not near any fault lines. In fact,
it's not near much of anything... except Sacramento. :)
Yep. Keep in mind that W.Tasman to Sacramento is a 2 hour drive at any
given time and 3 1/2 hours on a Friday afternoon. Also, if you enjoy
Yep. Keep in mind that W.Tasman to Sacramento is a 2 hour drive at any
given time and 3 1/2 hours on a Friday afternoon. Also, if you enjoy
night life, Sacramento is not the best location on earth.
Yeah, that's something else to consider. Sometimes it's faster to take
Amtrak than it is to drive.
20 matches
Mail list logo
