It would be cool to update the NANOG Traceroute with MPLS
extensions.
-hc
--
Sincerely,
Haesu C.
TowardEX Technologies, Inc.
WWW: http://www.towardex.com
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cell: (978) 394-2867
On Mon, Aug 18, 2003 at 12:26:34AM +0200, Jesper Skriver wrote:
On Thu, Aug 14,
--
- Original Message -
From: Haesu [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 18, 2003 9:50 AM
Subject: Re: MPLS ICMP Extensions
It would be cool to update the NANOG Traceroute with MPLS
extensions.
-hc
--
Sincerely,
Haesu C.
TowardEX Technologies, Inc.
WWW: http
As far as I remember we have seen labels from other providers, until
they turned on the traceroute hide. And there was no LDP coupling
between them and us so ... . That was with Cisco in both networks.
The question is if these information cause any problem for you -
despite curious customers
On Thu, Aug 14, 2003 at 01:40:01PM -0400, Leo Bicknell wrote:
I wanted to get some other opinions on some new features that have
appeared in recent code from the popular vendors. It appears there
is a new draft, a copy of which can be found at
I wanted to get some other opinions on some new features that have
appeared in recent code from the popular vendors. It appears there
is a new draft, a copy of which can be found at
http://www.watersprings.org/links/mlr/id/draft-ietf-mpls-icmp-01.txt that
allows MPLS enabled boxes to return some
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2003 12:40 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: MPLS ICMP Extensions
I wanted to get some other opinions on some new features that have
appeared in recent code from the popular vendors. It appears there
is a new draft, a copy of which can be found
In a message written on Thu, Aug 14, 2003 at 01:21:28PM -0500, Mike Bernico wrote:
Maybe I'm wrong, but I thought that the extended MPLS info only showed
up when the trace was started on a PE or P router. Is that right?
I did the traceroute from a router with _NO_ mpls commands turned on,
and
