On Thu, 26 Jan 2006, Chris Owen wrote:
On Thu, 26 Jan 2006, Matt Ghali wrote:
Whoa. What ever happened to Karl Denninger anyway?
http://genesis3.blogspot.com/
Now I really wish I hadn't asked.
matto
[EMAIL PROTECTED]<
The only thing necessary for the triumph
o
Matt Ghali wrote:
On Thu, 26 Jan 2006, Martin Hannigan wrote:
And in all my years running news, I never came cross fleming or
williams so I wouldn't know. Someone called me and made a Denniger
and an Auerbach reference.
Whoa. What ever happened to Karl Denninger anyway?
O
On Thu, 26 Jan 2006, Matt Ghali wrote:
> On Thu, 26 Jan 2006, Martin Hannigan wrote:
>
> > And in all my years running news, I never came cross fleming or
> > williams so I wouldn't know. Someone called me and made a Denniger
> > and an Auerbach reference.
>
&g
On Thu, 26 Jan 2006, Martin Hannigan wrote:
And in all my years running news, I never came cross fleming or
williams so I wouldn't know. Someone called me and made a Denniger
and an Auerbach reference.
Whoa. What ever happened to Karl Denninger anyway?
[EMAIL PROTECTED]<
>
>
> > Martin is the 21st century version of Jim Fleming and
> > Jeff Williams. He entertains us with his hyperbole.
>
> i don't know if i'd go THAT far. none of those (fleming, williams, hannigan)
> entertains me with their nanog posts. (and neither does gadi.) with usenet
> gone, we just
> Martin is the 21st century version of Jim Fleming and
> Jeff Williams. He entertains us with his hyperbole.
i don't know if i'd go THAT far. none of those (fleming, williams, hannigan)
entertains me with their nanog posts. (and neither does gadi.) with usenet
gone, we just don't teach our ki
> What is it you do again? Anything what-so-ever?
Martin is the 21st century version of Jim Fleming and
Jeff Williams. He entertains us with his hyperbole.
Does anyone take him seriously anymore?
Remember that this worm has a very destructive payload. Even
if you discount the number here, youre still looking at a
significant number of people who will suffer potentially
devastating data loss."
I couldn't agree more.
Cheers,
- ferg
ps. http://sunbeltblog.blogspot.com/2006/01/bla
On Wed, 25 Jan 2006, Joe Abley wrote:
The NANOG list administrators can be reached at [EMAIL PROTECTED] That
is almost certainly a better place to send comments related to the AUP than
the this list.
(I would have kept this comment to private mail except that it seems possible
that a public
On 25-Jan-2006, at 16:12, william(at)elan.net wrote:
On Wed, 25 Jan 2006, Gadi Evron wrote:
Martin Hannigan wrote:
Admins: Clearly, a personal attack and I'd like the AUP enforced
please.
Clearly, exactly what you've been trying to get me to do for a
long time, to get me
On Wed, 25 Jan 2006, Gadi Evron wrote:
Martin Hannigan wrote:
Admins: Clearly, a personal attack and I'd like the AUP enforced
please.
Clearly, exactly what you've been trying to get me to do for a long time, to
get me off NANOG, well... I finally decided to comply.
Admi
Martin Hannigan wrote:
Admins: Clearly, a personal attack and I'd like the AUP enforced
please.
Clearly, exactly what you've been trying to get me to do for a long
time, to get me off NANOG, well... I finally decided to comply.
Admins: I will answer any call to leave.. Also, I&
>
> Serious answers: (much like your 'serious questions'):
>
> > If I don't see SANS running around with their capes off, I don't
>
> http://isc.sans.org/blackworm
> Further, our reports lead to a SANS ISC temporary URL's for each AS.
The last time SANS felt something was so serious they neede
Serious answers: (much like your 'serious questions'):
If I don't see SANS running around with their capes off, I don't
http://isc.sans.org/blackworm
Further, our reports lead to a SANS ISC temporary URL's for each AS.
really pay too much attention. The last one wasn't a big hit like
they t
14 matches
Mail list logo
