Does anybody have any experience with the MD400/MD450 appliances?
Good/bad/indifferent
Do they do anything I can't do myself with Sophie, Cyrus IMAP, Postfix and
SpamAssassing on a decent PC?
Would you recommend them for high volume VISP mail hosting? (around 600k
domains)
Thanks for any
Paul S. Brown writes on 11/19/2003 12:38 PM:
Does anybody have any experience with the MD400/MD450 appliances?
Good/bad/indifferent
Expensive
Do they do anything I can't do myself with Sophie, Cyrus IMAP, Postfix and
SpamAssassing on a decent PC?
Would you recommend them for high volume VISP
Paul S. Brown writes on 11/19/2003 2:19 PM:
The PC I was thinking of using for this would be the same spec as the
Mirapoint boxes (dual 2.8GHz P4, 2GB RAM, Lots of U320 RAID). I also wouldn't
be using a single PC.
Thought so - but if you spend some time putting things together, you get
more
On Wed, 19 Nov 2003, Paul S. Brown wrote:
Does anybody have any experience with the MD400/MD450 appliances?
Good/bad/indifferent
Bad and expensive.
Would you recommend them for high volume VISP mail hosting? (around 600k
domains)
Check out IronPort.
They've done a lot of wild stuff to make
Tom (UnitedLayer) writes on 11/19/2003 4:47 PM:
Would you recommend them for high volume VISP mail hosting? (around 600k
domains)
Check out IronPort.
They've done a lot of wild stuff to make their boxes hugely fast.
For commercial ware - Ironport is good.
There is also Theo Schlossnagle's
On Wed, 19 Nov 2003, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
For commercial ware - Ironport is good.
Yah, thats been my experience, its probably the only commercial solution
I'd buy.
Its a complete platform - Hardware, OS, Software
Also, Ironport is supporting some sort of Bonded Sender program, so that
Tom (UnitedLayer) writes on 11/19/2003 5:13 PM:
Also, Ironport is supporting some sort of Bonded Sender program, so that
may be a key thing to look for as well when buying something like this.
We use their bonded sender plus (a subset of bonded sender that is 100%
confirmed optin).
--
srs
On Wed, 2003-11-19 at 13:13, Tom (UnitedLayer) wrote:
On Wed, 19 Nov 2003, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
For commercial ware - Ironport is good.
Yah, thats been my experience, its probably the only commercial solution
I'd buy.
Its a complete platform - Hardware, OS, Software
We are using
On Wed, 19 Nov 2003, W.D. McKinney wrote:
We are using Barracuda Networks instead, but it's also a complete
platform with hardware, OS, and software. So far it's doing the job very
well, and we are one week into our trial so far.
Any idea what OS its based on?
On Wed, 19 Nov 2003, W.D. McKinney wrote:
We are using Barracuda Networks instead, but it's also a complete
platform with hardware, OS, and software. So far it's doing the job very
well, and we are one week into our trial so far.
Any idea what OS its based on?
Mandrake
DJ
10 matches
Mail list logo