Re: NANOG as the Internet government?

2005-08-30 Thread John Kristoff
On Tue, 30 Aug 2005 14:14:52 -0400 (EDT) "J. Oquendo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ten Commandments of the Interweb I'm biased, but I think these are better and less contestable: 1. Thou shalt above all, maintain the integrity of the network. 2. Thou shalt have a long term strategic direc

Re: NANOG as the Internet government?

2005-08-30 Thread Todd Vierling
On Tue, 30 Aug 2005, J. Oquendo wrote: > /* ARTICLE > Does the model still work? I'm not sure. In my view, the biggest concerns > facing the Internet today are regulatory and operational, rather than > technical. For example, how do we encourage providers to respect each > other's QoS tags? Is it

Re: NANOG as the Internet government?

2005-08-30 Thread Valdis . Kletnieks
On Tue, 30 Aug 2005 14:14:52 EDT, "J. Oquendo" said: > Ten Commandments of the Interweb xi. Thou shalt forswear the abuse of content-free buzzwords. Sorry, it needed saying. Unfortunately for the geeks among us, there's no easy way to number from zero in Roman numerals > ii. Thou shall n

Re: NANOG as the Internet government?

2005-08-30 Thread J. Oquendo
> > http://www.networkworld.com/columnists/2005/082205johnson.html > /* ARTICLE Did the Internet/IETF governance model work? In many respects, yes. Early on, the IETF produced key protocols at a much faster clip than other network standards bodies (such as the IEEE and the ITU). Although many IE

NANOG as the Internet government?

2005-08-30 Thread Steven M. Bellovin
http://www.networkworld.com/columnists/2005/082205johnson.html --Steven M. Bellovin, http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~smb