Re: New IPv4 Allocation to ARIN

2004-01-19 Thread Michael . Dillon
Alternatively, the RIRs might consider doing this sort of thing before allocating IPs from new blocks. I know it's not their job to make sure IPs are routable (especially not on every remote network), but as holders of all the IPs, they are in the best position to setup such test sites that

Re: New IPv4 Allocation to ARIN

2004-01-19 Thread Daniel Karrenberg
On 16.01 13:13, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ... Alternatively, the RIRs might consider doing this sort of thing before allocating IPs from new blocks. I know it's not their job to make sure IPs are routable (especially not on every remote network), but as holders of all the IPs, they are in

Re: New IPv4 Allocation to ARIN

2004-01-19 Thread Rob Thomas
Hi, NANOGers. ] Cooperation with the bogon project seems logical too. We at Team Cymru are happy to help in any way we can! Thanks, Rob. -- Rob Thomas http://www.cymru.com ASSERT(coffee != empty);

Re: New IPv4 Allocation to ARIN

2004-01-19 Thread william
It has been known for quite some time that next block to be allocated to ARIN is 70/8 (and next one will be 71/8). It might have been nice if ARIN were to run projections and inform community that by its projections it will be requesting new /8 ip block in say 2 month time. On Mon, 19 Jan

Re: New IPv4 Allocation to ARIN

2004-01-19 Thread william
On Mon, 19 Jan 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Alternatively, the RIRs might consider doing this sort of thing before allocating IPs from new blocks. I know it's not their job to make sure IPs are routable (especially not on every remote network), but as holders of all the IPs, they are in

Re: New IPv4 Allocation to ARIN

2004-01-19 Thread Pete Templin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ARIN could however do more to help, such as providing special temporary test blocks on request Perhaps ARIN (or others) could supply their respective portions of unallocated space to a common BOGON project? pt

RE: New IPv4 Allocation to ARIN

2004-01-19 Thread McBurnett, Jim
-Perhaps ARIN (or others) could supply their respective portions of -unallocated space to a common BOGON project? - -pt - Great idea.. HMM.. Rob, how about it? Say take in BGP feed from ARIN, APNIC etc. And then use that for redis? Or go even farther IANA-- Could you give a feed and make

Re: New IPv4 Allocation to ARIN

2004-01-19 Thread william
Also as you know I have been running statistics at http://www.completewhois.com/statistics/ (note: dont believe about green for 70/8, I still have not fixed collection to ignore occasional single wrong announcements from routeviews) Its interesting that 69/8 block is currently only 39%

Re: New IPv4 Allocation to ARIN

2004-01-19 Thread Richard A Steenbergen
On Mon, Jan 19, 2004 at 10:22:08AM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Also as you know I have been running statistics at http://www.completewhois.com/statistics/ (note: dont believe about green for 70/8, I still have not fixed collection to ignore occasional single wrong announcements from

Re: New IPv4 Allocation to ARIN

2004-01-19 Thread Owen DeLong
Not to rain on your parade, but, how do you know 71 will go to ARIN and not to RIPE, APNIC, or LACNIC or AfriNIC? Owen --On Monday, January 19, 2004 9:27 -0800 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It has been known for quite some time that next block to be allocated to ARIN is 70/8 (and next one will be

Re: New IPv4 Allocation to ARIN

2004-01-19 Thread william
I don't know for certain and I'm guessing based on existing pattern (although for 70/8 ARIN did mention at one point it will be allocated to them I think). The pattern is that IANA tries to allocate blocks consequently to RIRs (don't know why, its not like like RIRs would be announcing blocks as

1/8 and 2/8 (was Re: New IPv4 Allocation to ARIN)

2004-01-19 Thread John Palmer
What about 1/8 and 2/8? Are those being reserved for something special - Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Owen DeLong [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, January 19, 2004 16:55 Subject: Re: New IPv4 Allocation to ARIN I don't know for certain

Re: 1/8 and 2/8 (was Re: New IPv4 Allocation to ARIN)

2004-01-19 Thread Petri Helenius
John Palmer wrote: What about 1/8 and 2/8? Are those being reserved for something special 1/8 will be given to the person who most accurately guesses the incoming bitrate when you announce 1/8. :-) Pete

Re: New IPv4 Allocation to ARIN

2004-01-18 Thread Petri Helenius
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It's those dang Nachi-sized ICMP echo/echo-replies. We block those at all our transit points and dial-up ports. Nachi was killing our cisco access-servers until we did this to stop the spread. Unfortunately, this breaks Windows tracert as it uses 92-byte echo

Re: New IPv4 Allocation to ARIN

2004-01-18 Thread Pete Templin
Petri Helenius wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It's those dang Nachi-sized ICMP echo/echo-replies. We block those at all our transit points and dial-up ports. Nachi was killing our cisco access-servers until we did this to stop the spread. I know what they are and how to get around them. I

Re: New IPv4 Allocation to ARIN

2004-01-18 Thread jlewis
On Sun, 18 Jan 2004, Petri Helenius wrote: It's those dang Nachi-sized ICMP echo/echo-replies. We block those at all our transit points and dial-up ports. Nachi was killing our cisco ^^^ access-servers until we did this to

Re: New IPv4 Allocation to ARIN

2004-01-16 Thread Valdis . Kletnieks
On Thu, 15 Jan 2004 15:31:37 PST, Steve Conte [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: This is to inform you that the IANA has allocated 70/8 to ARIN. All you early adopters of 69/8 now have somebody to share your pain with pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: New IPv4 Allocation to ARIN

2004-01-16 Thread jlewis
On Fri, 16 Jan 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, 15 Jan 2004 15:31:37 PST, Steve Conte [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: This is to inform you that the IANA has allocated 70/8 to ARIN. All you early adopters of 69/8 now have somebody to share your pain with There are still numerous

Re: New IPv4 Allocation to ARIN

2004-01-16 Thread Valdis . Kletnieks
On Fri, 16 Jan 2004 11:34:18 EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: There are still numerous networks blocking 69/8. Probably more blocking 70/8 as most of the people who were behind the times with their filters blocking 69/8 fixed that /8 but still don't keep their filters up to date.

Re: New IPv4 Allocation to ARIN

2004-01-16 Thread jlewis
On Fri, 16 Jan 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, 16 Jan 2004 11:34:18 EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: There are still numerous networks blocking 69/8. Probably more blocking 70/8 as most of the people who were behind the times with their filters blocking 69/8 fixed that /8 but

Re: New IPv4 Allocation to ARIN

2004-01-16 Thread matt
On Fri, 16 Jan 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, 16 Jan 2004 11:34:18 EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: There are still numerous networks blocking 69/8. Probably more blocking 70/8 as most of the people who were behind the times with their filters blocking 69/8 fixed that /8 but

Re: New IPv4 Allocation to ARIN

2004-01-16 Thread Matthew S. Hallacy
On Fri, Jan 16, 2004 at 10:56:24AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: All you early adopters of 69/8 now have somebody to share your pain with I wouldn't be surprised if more people are filtering 69/8 now than before, roughly 40% of the spam hitting my servers is from there. -- Matthew S.

Re: New IPv4 Allocation to ARIN

2004-01-16 Thread Valdis . Kletnieks
On Fri, 16 Jan 2004 11:29:16 PST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: and the block can be used as part of the normal allocation and assigned as appropriate (would kinda suck to be given the last assignment from the block, only to be told that sorry, your last /24 is actually routed by the RIR, so you

Re: New IPv4 Allocation to ARIN

2004-01-16 Thread Petri Helenius
Matthew S. Hallacy wrote: On Fri, Jan 16, 2004 at 10:56:24AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: All you early adopters of 69/8 now have somebody to share your pain with I wouldn't be surprised if more people are filtering 69/8 now than before, roughly 40% of the spam hitting my servers

Re: New IPv4 Allocation to ARIN

2004-01-16 Thread jlewis
On Fri, 16 Jan 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Of course, if they tried to run the test *before* assigning the block, it should fail, because it should still be in everyone's bogon filters. ^_^ So before assigning a block, mark it as Pending assignment or Assigned to IANA. their bogon

Re: New IPv4 Allocation to ARIN

2004-01-16 Thread william
On Fri, 16 Jan 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, 16 Jan 2004, Petri Helenius wrote: I wouldn't be surprised if more people are filtering 69/8 now than before, roughly 40% of the spam hitting my servers is from there. That's likely going to be true of each newly allocated block as

Nachi (was Re: New IPv4 Allocation to ARIN)

2004-01-16 Thread Michael Lewinski
On Jan 16, 2004, at 3:31 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It's those dang Nachi-sized ICMP echo/echo-replies. We block those at all our transit points and dial-up ports. Nachi was killing our cisco access-servers until we did this to stop the spread. FYI, Nachi is basically dead now from what

New IPv4 Allocation to ARIN

2004-01-15 Thread Steve Conte
Greetings, This is to inform you that the IANA has allocated 70/8 to ARIN. For a full list of IANA IPv4 allocations please see: http://www.iana.org/assignments/ipv4-address-space. Thanks, Steve --- Steve Conte - IANA [EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP KeyID: 0x0972C473