> In general, whatever router is in use, be it Juniper or Pentium or Gerbil,
> will either keep up with the offered packets/sec, or it won't.
and, if you want to know if it does, measure it, don't read marketing
bumph.
randy
On Fri, 16 Sep 2005 23:55:05 PDT, "Christopher J. Wolff" said:
> So, if all other elements (software, customer support, and management) are
> equal, what router hardware architecture will contribute to a positive or
> negative user experience? In other words, if the routing device between my
> wor
[let me preface this by saying that if you don't know this already, i do
happen to work for a router vendor]
from the perspective of ANY router, "quality of end-user experience" is
not something which fits into layers 1-7 - its a layer 8-10 thing.
however, having said that, certainly routers
Thanks for the thoughtful response.
One of the network architecture issues I'm always trying to gauge and get my
arms around is what I'll call, "Quality of user experience." In other
words, what mix of network hardware, software, customer support, and
management will create a perception that the
