It gives number crunching an entirely new meaning.
-Original Message-
From: Bill Nash [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 01 April 2005 19:09
To: Church, Chuck
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
Subject: RE: Cisco to merge with Nabisco
On Fri, 1 Apr 2005, Church, Chuck wrote:
Incorrectly chosen
Well, they already eat into your profits.
-Original Message-
From: Wayne E. Bouchard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 01 April 2005 22:34
To: Fergie (Paul Ferguson)
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
Subject: Re: Cisco to merge with Nabisco
Does this mean our routers will be edible? :-)
On Fri
Pendergrass, Greg wrote:
Well, they already eat into your profits.
In Nibbles, or in Bytes ?
:P
-Original Message-
From: Wayne E. Bouchard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 01 April 2005 22:34
To: Fergie (Paul Ferguson)
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
Subject: Re: Cisco to merge with Nabisco
At 11:45 AM 4/1/2005, you wrote:
Priceless. ;-)
The Register:
Published Friday 1st April 2005 15:22 GMT
Cisco Systems and Kraft Foods shocked investors today
with an unlikely mega-acquisition that will see Cisco
buy Kraft's Nabisco unit for $15bn. Perhaps even more
surprising, former RJR Nabisco
On Fri, 1 Apr 2005, Robert Boyle wrote:
Brilliant move Cisco! This should give Cisco a keen and unprecedented insight
into the inner workings of the cracker culture which will enable better
network security.
'Network devices are rated by total packet volume, not chassis weight.
Packets may
Runts are hereinafter referred to as crumbs.
Hilton
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Apr 1 11:30:15 2005
Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2005 09:33:16 -0800 (PST)
From: Bill Nash [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Robert Boyle [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
Subject: Re: Cisco to merge with Nabisco
On Fri, 1 Apr 2005, Robert Boyle wrote:
Brilliant move Cisco
Incorrectly chosen switching path can now result in lost packets AND
indigestion.
Chuck
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Dave Hilton
Sent: Friday, April 01, 2005 12:44 PM
To: nanog@merit.edu
Subject: RE: Cisco to merge with Nabisco
On Fri, 1 Apr 2005, Church, Chuck wrote:
Incorrectly chosen switching path can now result in lost packets AND
indigestion.
Is this mitigated by activating Nabisco Express Forwarding?
At 01:09 PM 4/1/2005, you wrote:
On Fri, 1 Apr 2005, Church, Chuck wrote:
Incorrectly chosen switching path can now result in lost packets AND
indigestion.
Is this mitigated by activating Nabisco Express Forwarding?
That would be really bad! You would almost immediately gain 300lbs if you
enabled
Must we now redefine nibbles bytes.
Resellers beware-
New distribution channels will be opened up,
Girl Scouts will soon be seen offering
byte-able cookies in blue-green boxes,
door to door and in unlikely places!
Stale inventory is not expected to become
a problem even with the increased distribution.
On Fri, 01 Apr 2005 10:15:55 PST, Dave Hilton said:
Must we now redefine nibbles bytes.
Read RFC4042 - they've just been increased 12.5%. Supersize-me! :)
pgpQxtmI8nUVh.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Church, Chuck [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Incorrectly chosen switching path can now result in lost packets AND
indigestion.
I wonder how they're going to integrate Chips Ahoy into the existing Cisco
lineup. Nabisco always used to advertise that Chips Ahoy has far more chips
than any of the
On Fri, 1 Apr 2005 10:15:55 -0800
Dave Hilton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Must we now redefine nibbles bytes.
Well, I guess remote configs will have to be disabled - from now on the
only permitted access will be via the cereal port ...
Richard
On Fri, 1 Apr 2005, Steve Sobol wrote:
Church, Chuck [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Incorrectly chosen switching path can now result in lost packets AND
indigestion.
I wonder how they're going to integrate Chips Ahoy into the existing Cisco
lineup. Nabisco always used to advertise that
]
PGP key: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=getsearch=0x4371A48D
-Original Message-
From: Bill Nash [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, April 01, 2005 1:09 PM
To: Church, Chuck
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
Subject: RE: Cisco to merge with Nabisco
On Fri, 1 Apr 2005, Church, Chuck wrote
You mean SNACK engineers, right?
- Andy
Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2005 13:35:11 -0600
From: Church, Chuck [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Bill Nash [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
Subject: RE: Cisco to merge with Nabisco
Yes. According to the Keebler elves, who now are 3rd level TAC
engineers
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Apr 1 13:19:44 2005
Date: Fri, 01 Apr 2005 20:18:38 +0100
From: Richard Cox [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: nanog@merit.edu
Subject: Re: Cisco to merge with Nabisco
On Fri, 1 Apr 2005 10:15:55 -0800
Dave Hilton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Must we now redefine nibbles
They don't already?
-ejay
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On
Behalf Of Church, Chuck
Sent: Friday, April 01, 2005 11:54 AM
To: nanog@merit.edu
Subject: RE: Cisco to merge with Nabisco
Incorrectly chosen switching path can now result
On Fri, 1 Apr 2005, Bill Nash wrote:
On Fri, 1 Apr 2005, Church, Chuck wrote:
Incorrectly chosen switching path can now result in lost packets AND
indigestion.
Is this mitigated by activating Nabisco Express Forwarding?
Yes, but this is only available with the Gastric Bypass feature
On Fri, Apr 01, 2005 at 09:33:16AM -0800, Bill Nash wrote:
'Network devices are rated by total packet volume, not chassis weight.
Packets may settle during shipping.'
No, Bill, that's the VoIP thread. Pay attention.
Cheers,
-- jra
--
Jay R. Ashworth
Does this mean our routers will be edible? :-)
On Fri, Apr 01, 2005 at 04:45:17PM +, Fergie (Paul Ferguson) wrote:
Priceless. ;-)
The Register:
Published Friday 1st April 2005 15:22 GMT
Cisco Systems and Kraft Foods shocked investors today
with an unlikely mega-acquisition that
On Fri, Apr 01, 2005 at 10:09:12AM -0800, Bill Nash wrote:
On Fri, 1 Apr 2005, Church, Chuck wrote:
Incorrectly chosen switching path can now result in lost packets AND
indigestion.
Is this mitigated by activating Nabisco Express Forwarding?
. o O ( aka diarrhea? )
---
Wayne
24 matches
Mail list logo
