On Fri, 20 Jun 2003, Andy Dills wrote:
I dunno, there are plenty of smaller ASes who have yet to be forced to
register their routes.
We haven't yet been forced, but I finally got motivated to submit them to
altdb last night. Altdb definitely rocks.
Back when I got PI space in 1998, there
Negative.
-Ejay
-Original Message-
From: Deepak Jain [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2003 11:43 PM
To: Kevin Oberman; Vandy Hamidi
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: IRR/RADB and BGP
I strongly approve of such requirement. I know that it is in the peering
On Fri, 20 Jun 2003, Deepak Jain wrote:
I strongly approve of such requirement. I know that it is in the peering
agreements of several carriers, but they often don't check or enforce
this. Many register customer routes and ASes. If routes and policies
were properly registered, securing
On Fri, 20 Jun 2003, Deepak Jain wrote:
I strongly approve of such requirement. I know that it is in
the peering
agreements of several carriers, but they often don't check or enforce
this. Many register customer routes and ASes. If routes and policies
were properly
: Vandy Hamidi; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: IRR/RADB and BGP
On Thu, 19 Jun 2003, Randy Bush wrote:
the providers i know who want irr registration provide their own
registry for their customers. if yours does not, there are free
registries around.
Just in case they don't, or if you'd
Our new ISP is asking that I create a maintainer object in the
RADB and associated AS/Routes for us to be about to eBGP peer.
congrats. you got a quality provider who cares about good safe
routing practice.
Is this just so they can dynamically build their prefix/as-path
lists?
i would
Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2003 15:30:32 -0700
From: Vandy Hamidi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Our new ISP is asking that I create a maintainer object in the RADB and
associated AS/Routes for us to be about to eBGP peer.
This is the first time I've been asked by a provider to do
On Thu, 19 Jun 2003, Randy Bush wrote:
the providers i know who want irr registration provide their own
registry for their customers. if yours does not, there are free
registries around.
Just in case they don't, or if you'd rather be provider neutral in case
you switch providers or worry
Register for free at :
http://www.altdb.net
James Edwards
Routing and Security
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
At the Santa Fe Office: Internet at Cyber Mesa
Vandy Hamidi wrote:
Our new ISP is asking that I create a maintainer object in the RADB
and associated AS/Routes for us to be about to eBGP peer.
This is the first time I've been asked by a provider to do this for
something as simple as peering to advertise a couple /24's.
I've peered
On Thu, Jun 19, 2003 at 03:30:32PM -0700, Vandy Hamidi wrote:
Cost to register with RADB is $250/year and I want to understand it
before I shell out.
http://www.altdb.net/
--
Richard A Steenbergen [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204
### On Thu, 19 Jun 2003 15:46:48 -0700, Kevin Oberman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
### casually decided to expound upon Vandy Hamidi
### [EMAIL PROTECTED] the following thoughts about Re:
### IRR/RADB and BGP :
KO You need to have routes registered in the IRR, but not necessarily the
KO RADB. The RADB
I strongly approve of such requirement. I know that it is in the peering
agreements of several carriers, but they often don't check or enforce
this. Many register customer routes and ASes. If routes and policies
were properly registered, securing the Internet would be a lot closer
to being
13 matches
Mail list logo
