--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> What (if any) are the legal implications of taking internet destined
> traffic in one country and egressing it in another (with an ip block
> correctly marked for the correct country).
>
> Somebody mentioned to me the other day that they thought the Dutch
> governme
On July 27, 2007 at 06:14 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lionel Elie Mamane) wrote:
>
> Also, I've heard that Canada had (maybe still has) this legislation
> forbidding you to route intra-Canadian *telephone* traffic through
> another country. Something about else nobody would build a
> intercontinenta
On Jul 27, 2007, at 6:14 AM, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
[...]
(And I've repeatedly heard that in the Netherlands, for some time
in the past at
least, the way the ISPs got rid of the lawful intercept obligation was
to have the AMS-IX send a copy of *all* the traffic to the government
black bo
On 7/27/07, Lionel Elie Mamane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> What I would expect is that you still have to obey lawful intercept
> legislation, so you need to interconnect with the government "black
> box" rooms, and these are at the major IXs in the country. (And I've
> repeatedly heard that in
Scott Weeks wrote:
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What (if any) are the legal implications of taking internet destined
traffic in one country and egressing it in another (with an ip block
correctly marked for the correct country).
Somebody mentioned to me the other day that they thought the Dut
On Thu, Jul 26, 2007 at 08:52:55AM +0100, Andy Loukes wrote:
> What (if any) are the legal implications of taking internet destined
> traffic in one country and egressing it in another (with an ip block
> correctly marked for the correct country).
> Somebody mentioned to me the other day that th
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Scott Weeks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
>--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>What (if any) are the legal implications of taking internet destined
>traffic in one country and egressing it in another (with an ip block
>correctly marked for the correct country).
>
>So
good luck with that :)
On 7/26/07, Scott Weeks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What (if any) are the legal implications of taking internet destined
traffic in one country and egressing it in another (with an ip block
correctly marked for the correct country).
Somebo
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What (if any) are the legal implications of taking internet destined
traffic in one country and egressing it in another (with an ip block
correctly marked for the correct country).
Somebody mentioned to me the other day that they thought the Dutch
government didn't
Andy,
I've always wondered this as well. Similar scenario, although not
necessarily egress in a foreign country, but transiting through.
For a brief period, we had an OC48 that carried packets on our network
between Chicago and Seattle that traversed a router of ours in Vancouver, BC
Canada.
A
10 matches
Mail list logo
