-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Yoi All!
My apologies to the list for beating a dead horse. This was sent around
noon today, but Merit had issues with my reverse DNS until later in the
day
RGDS
GARY
-
John Curran wrote:
incidents from almost every router vendor on the planet (and simply
don't buy from the ones that fail to correct the problem).
Yep, that's the important one to me. Most of the time I don't really care
when a brand makes a stupid mistake, what I judge the company on is then
I have received similar emails (not many) in the past from ATT
and other providers, but nothing recently. At the time I received the
emails we were not doing business with ATT either; I do find it
annoying, it was not a big problem since it only happen a couple of
times.
Chris Burton
In the last few days I have had two spams with injection
point 127.0.0.1. This definitely needs to be addressed
by ATT. Anyone online from ATT like to say something?
Jeffrey Race
On Wed, 14 Apr 2004 14:17:08 -0400 (EDT), William R. Lorenz
wrote:
So, with ATT being a network provider at
] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Dr. Jeffrey Race
Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2004 2:40 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: SPAM Directly from ATT Data Networking
In the last few days I have had two spams with injection
point 127.0.0.1. This definitely needs to be addressed
by ATT. Anyone
Pls see interleaved comments:
On Wed, 14 Apr 2004 14:25:45 -0500, Callahan, Richard M, GVSOL wrote:
I do work for ATT and I do have a vested interest in SPAM and other ISP related
issues.
Good so far
Some of you may recall I was the naive idiot that allowed ATT to launch
the Do Not Call
On Wed, 14 Apr 2004, Callahan, Richard M, GVSOL wrote:
Having spoken directly to her, I would like to point out that she did
indeed take the time to research the FCC SPAM laws and has stuck to
them. She has provided an opt-out message and assures me she takes it
very seriously. If you have
, Richard M, GVSOL
Cc: Dr. Jeffrey Race; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: SPAM Directly from ATT Data Networking
On Wed, 14 Apr 2004, Callahan, Richard M, GVSOL wrote:
Having spoken directly to her, I would like to point out that she did
indeed take the time to research the FCC SPAM laws and has
Callahan, Richard M, GVSOL [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The other side of this coin is her responsibilities are to sell
specifically to ISP's, she is young, aggressive and very successful.
Perhaps you can share her personal email account information with the
list? From time to time I have
At 5:11 PM -0400 4/14/04, Robert E. Seastrom wrote:
All of ATT's competitors' rate structures have been significantly
reduced over the past couple of years too; I wonder how many people
are deciding that they'll invoke the Boulder Pledge (*) and take their
business elsewhere.
If a company shows
On Wed, 14 Apr 2004 16:38:54 -0500, Stewart, William C (Bill), RTSLS wrote:
It looks like you as an attglobal.net customer might have received it from
another attglobal.net user
Yes this is what I suspected
(or else there was other header forgery going on -
it looks like you didn't provide
Having spoken directly to her, I would like to point out that she did
indeed take the time to research the FCC SPAM laws and has stuck to
them. She has provided an opt-out message and assures me she takes it
very seriously. If you have responded to her with a request to NOT be
contacted again,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Yo Richard!
On Wed, 14 Apr 2004, Callahan, Richard M, GVSOL wrote:
She has provided an opt-out message and assures me she takes it
very seriously. If you have responded to her with a request to NOT be
contacted again, you have not been.
So do
13 matches
Mail list logo
