Perhaps the list should be turned into a wiki;
I might just to watch the hilarity. Is there any real interest in this?
Do we want another wiki to compete with http://nanog.cluepon.net ?
Mediawiki is a good idea, but proliferation is not so good.
Also, if you want to contribute, why not
Perhaps the list should be turned into a wiki; and no, while I'd like to, I'm
not
at this time volunteering to admin ;)
Frank A. Coluccio
DTI Consulting Inc.
212-587-8150 Office
347-526-6788 Mobile
On Wed Sep 13 15:43 , [EMAIL PROTECTED] sent:
It's insulting
when you trim the message to a
Le 2006-09-13 à 15:43, [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
P.S. are the standards of this list so unclear that
Darcy and I have to discuss this? Who is right?
http://nanog.cluepon.net/index.php/Posting_Style_Conventions
Joe
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of
Frank Coluccio
Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2006 3:48 PM
To: nanog@merit.edu; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Watch your replies (was Kremen)
Perhaps the list should be turned into a wiki
Le 2006-09-13 à 15:59, Andrew Kirch a écrit :
I might just to watch the hilarity. Is there any real interest in
this?
MediaWiki with restricted editing for people on the NANOG list.
At the risk of repeating myself, http://nanog.cluepon.net/. This is
a NANOG wiki with somewhat
On Wed, 13 Sep 2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's insulting
when you trim the message to a shorter statement that you are
responding to. The other 18 lines may not have been important to this
particular response but they were not content free.
If your content was in any way, interesting,
