A reasonable latency to expect between Chicago and London would be 92ms
RTT.
Brian Knoll
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Neal R
Sent: Thursday, June 28, 2007 6:21 PM
To: nanog@merit.edu
Subject: trans-Atlantic latency?
I have a cust
On Thu 28 Jun 2007 (18:20 -0500), Neal R wrote:
>
>
> I have a customer with IP transport from Sprint and McLeod and fiber
> connectivity to Sprint in the Chicago area. The person making the
> decisions is not a routing guy but is very sharp overall. He is
> currently examining the latency on
Peter Dambier wrote:
Neal R wrote:
I have a customer with IP transport from Sprint and McLeod and fiber
connectivity to Sprint in the Chicago area. The person making the
decisions is not a routing guy but is very sharp overall. He is
currently examining the latency on trans-Atlantic links
Neal R wrote:
I have a customer with IP transport from Sprint and McLeod and fiber
connectivity to Sprint in the Chicago area. The person making the
decisions is not a routing guy but is very sharp overall. He is
currently examining the latency on trans-Atlantic links and has fixed on
the ide
I used to get about 60ms from router to router in TAT12/13 (I think)
from London Telehouse to NY Telehouse.
Security Admin (NetSec) wrote:
Sprint has probably the lowest latency in the industry; I use them for a Los
Angeles - London IPSec VPN. Typical latency is around 140-150 ms rt (70
Sprint has probably the lowest latency in the industry; I use them for a Los
Angeles - London IPSec VPN. Typical latency is around 140-150 ms rt (70-75 ms
one-way)
40 ms RT is not possible in this reality, unless the speed of light is
increased or one transimits through subspace (see Star Tre
Neal R wrote:
I have a customer with IP transport from Sprint and McLeod and fiber
connectivity to Sprint in the Chicago area. The person making the
decisions is not a routing guy but is very sharp overall. He is
currently examining the latency on trans-Atlantic links and has fixed on
the ide
On Thu, Jun 28, 2007 at 06:20:31PM -0500, Neal R wrote:
> I have a customer with IP transport from Sprint and McLeod and fiber
> connectivity to Sprint in the Chicago area. The person making the
> decisions is not a routing guy but is very sharp overall. He is
> currently examining the latency o
On 29-jun-2007, at 1:20, Neal R wrote:
What is a reasonable latency to see on a link of that distance?
You'll want to ask whether this is one-way latency or round trip time.
I'm seeing this from Amsterdam:
6 51.ae0.cr2.iad1.us.scnet.net (216.246.102.94) 82.686 ms 82.762
ms 82.808
