Joe Rhett wrote:
What if a company doesn't want to deal with
any registrar? What if they just want to
register their domain name and have it stay registered.
I really can't think of any domain name registrant that this statement
doesn't apply to -- even the spammers.
shrug The purpose is so that
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It is a matter of choosing a registrar that has the right business model
and services to suit the registrant.
What if a company doesn't want to deal with
any registrar? What if they just want to
register their domain name and have it stay
registered. For some
[a dated, biased (what isn't?), insightful, and
relevant interview]
Published on Policy DevCenter
(http://www.oreillynet.com/policy/)
http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/a/policy/2002/12/05/karl.html
Karl Auerbach: ICANN Out of Control
by Richard Koman
12/05/2002
Editor's note: Strong forces
the panix.com incident, a few nights of dreaming
solutions, and this interview lead me wonder about
p2p dns.
david
And, on this point, I believe Karl was right.
$.02,
- ferg
-- David M. Besonen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Auerbach: The public interest is not being served.
--
Fergie, a.k.a. Paul Ferguson
Engineering Architecture for the Internet
[EMAIL PROTECTED] or
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
