RE: Strange behavior of Catalyst4006

2004-06-29 Thread Joe Shen
I'm sorry I made a mistake the subnet between catalyst4006 and customer's firewall is 10.10.1.213/30, Catalyst4006's interface address is 10.10.1.213, firewall's interface address is 10.10.1.214. Sorry. Joe On Mon, 28 Jun 2004 21:24 , Tony Rall [EMAIL PROTECTED] sent: On Monday,

RE: Strange behavior of Catalyst4006

2004-06-29 Thread Pendergrass, Greg
-Original Message- From: Joe Shen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 29 June 2004 02:01 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Strange behavior of Catalyst4006 Hi, We met a strange problem with Catalyst 4006 when provideing leased line service to one of our customers. Catalyst4006

Re: Strange behavior of Catalyst4006

2004-06-29 Thread Robert Blayzor
Joe Shen wrote: I'm sorry I made a mistake the subnet between catalyst4006 and customer's firewall is 10.10.1.213/30, Catalyst4006's interface address is 10.10.1.213, firewall's interface address is 10.10.1.214. Have you tried enabling a monitor port on the Cat4k and sniffing what exactly is

RE: Strange behavior of Catalyst4006

2004-06-29 Thread Scott McGrath
Joe, If you are using NAT 0 you need to have a static translation enabled. Otherwise when the machine first comes up it arp's which creates an xlate entry on the PIX which times out when the inactivity timer runs out. This causes behavior similar to what you are experiencing

Strange behavior of Catalyst4006

2004-06-28 Thread Joe Shen
Hi, We met a strange problem with Catalyst 4006 when provideing leased line service to one of our customers. Catalyst4006 Customer's firewall ---Customer's Intranet The customer is allocated a Class C address block 192.168.5/24. And , they

RE: Strange behavior of Catalyst4006

2004-06-28 Thread Erik Amundson
PROTECTED] Subject: Strange behavior of Catalyst4006 Hi, We met a strange problem with Catalyst 4006 when provideing leased line service to one of our customers. Catalyst4006 Customer's firewall ---Customer's Intranet The customer is allocated a Class

Re: Strange behavior of Catalyst4006

2004-06-28 Thread Robert Blayzor
Joe Shen wrote: The customer is allocated a Class C address block 192.168.5/24. And , they connect their network to our network by using a firewall. The Interface on Cata4006 is set up as no switchport, and inter-connecting subnet is configured between Cata4006 and firewall

RE: Strange behavior of Catalyst4006

2004-06-28 Thread Greg Schwimer
Some things you can look into: firewall interface(10.10.1.122/30). ip route 192.168.5.0 255.255.255.0 10.10.1.124 Is that the firewall interface is 10.10.1.122, or is it 10.10.1.124? 10.10.1.122 is a host address in the 10.10.1.120/30 subnet. 10.10.1.124 is a /30 network. Either

RE: Strange behavior of Catalyst4006

2004-06-28 Thread Tony Rall
On Monday, 2004-06-28 at 20:41 MST, Greg Schwimer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Some things you can look into: firewall interface(10.10.1.122/30). ip route 192.168.5.0 255.255.255.0 10.10.1.124 Is that the firewall interface is 10.10.1.122, or is it 10.10.1.124? 10.10.1.122 is a host