> From: Joe Abley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Sun, 21 Nov 2004 19:55:10 -0500
>
>
> On 20 Nov 2004, at 19:13, Kevin Oberman wrote:
>
> > In any case, if the prefix length is >64, routing is done in the
> > CPU.
>
> Engineers at Juniper seem to be telling me that this is definitively
> not the
On 20 Nov 2004, at 19:13, Kevin Oberman wrote:
In any case, if the prefix length is >64, routing is done in the
CPU.
Engineers at Juniper seem to be telling me that this is definitively
not the case for their M- and T-series routers. Which routers were you
referring to?
Joe
> Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2004 10:11:36 -0800
> From: Crist Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> Lars Erik Gullerud wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 2004-11-19 at 16:36, Stephen Sprunk wrote:
> >
> >
> >>/127 prefixes are assumed for point-to-point links, and presumably an
> >>organizat
Hi Dan,
I've got some slides from talks I've done, they cover this sortof stuff.
You can see at http://www.sixlabs.org/talks/
Additionally, the size is 2^(128-prefixlen) [more or less]
But you don't use all of them, obviously, it'd be fairly difficult, best
part about a /64 is EUI-64 works (aut
On Fri, Nov 19, 2004 at 12:25:10PM -0500, Leo Bicknell wrote:
> FWIW, my test networks have always been configured with /126's, and
> have never had an issue.
>
> With the exception of auto-configuration, I have yet to see any
> IPv6 gear that cares about prefix length. Configuring a /1 to a
> /
ssage-
From: Dan Mahoney, System Admin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 19, 2004 2:12 PM
To: Scott Morris
Cc: 'Kevin Loch'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [nanog] RE: Stupid Ipv6 question...
On Fri, 19 Nov 2004, Scott Morris wrote:
No, nobody ever reads that tag. I
we may be prosecuted?
;)
Scott
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Kevin Loch
Sent: Friday, November 19, 2004 1:41 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Stupid Ipv6 question...
Leo Bicknell wrote:
With the exception of auto-configuration, I have yet
Does that mean if we rip them off that we may be prosecuted?
;)
Scott
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Kevin Loch
Sent: Friday, November 19, 2004 1:41 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Stupid Ipv6 question...
Leo Bicknell wrote
Leo Bicknell wrote:
With the exception of auto-configuration, I have yet to see any
IPv6 gear that cares about prefix length. Configuring a /1 to a
/128 seems to work just fine. If anyone knows of gear imposing
narrower limits on what can be configured I'd be facinated to know
about them.
64 bit
Lars Erik Gullerud wrote:
On Fri, 2004-11-19 at 16:36, Stephen Sprunk wrote:
/127 prefixes are assumed for point-to-point links, and presumably an
organization will divide up a single /64 for all ptp links -- unless they
have more than 9,223,372,036,854,775,808 of them.
While that would seem lo
In a message written on Fri, Nov 19, 2004 at 05:15:26PM +0100, Lars Erik
Gullerud wrote:
> While that would seem logical for most engineers, used to /30 or /31 ptp
> links in IPv4 (myself included), that does not in fact seem to be the
> way things are currently done in IPv6, unless something chan
On Fri, 2004-11-19 at 16:36, Stephen Sprunk wrote:
> /127 prefixes are assumed for point-to-point links, and presumably an
> organization will divide up a single /64 for all ptp links -- unless they
> have more than 9,223,372,036,854,775,808 of them.
While that would seem logical for most engi
Thus spake "Dan Mahoney, System Admin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I'm having trouble wrapping my head around ipv6 style suffixes -- does
anyone have a chart handy? How big is a /64, specifically?
Subnet sizes work a bit differently in IPv6 due to autoconfiguration; nearly
all subnets are expected to be
On Fri, 19 Nov 2004, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
On Fri, Nov 19, 2004 at 03:06:43AM -0500,
Dan Mahoney, System Admin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
a message of 25 lines which said:
I'm having trouble wrapping my head around ipv6 style suffixes --
does anyone have a chart handy? How big is a /64, specif
On Fri, Nov 19, 2004 at 03:06:43AM -0500,
Dan Mahoney, System Admin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
a message of 25 lines which said:
> I'm having trouble wrapping my head around ipv6 style suffixes --
> does anyone have a chart handy? How big is a /64, specifically?
Since an IPv6 address is 128 b
In preparation for the upcoming advent of ipv6, I'm playing with a tunnel
I've gotten from HE's cool tunnelbroker, and I'm plagued by the question
that about an hour of google searching can't answer for me.
I'm having trouble wrapping my head around ipv6 style suffixes -- does
anyone have a cha
16 matches
Mail list logo
