Re: Tertiary or 2nd Secondary DNS?

2003-07-13 Thread Mans Nilsson
Subject: Tertiary or 2nd Secondary DNS? Date: Tue, Jul 08, 2003 at 04:22:49PM -0400 Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > If you have a customer who is doing their own primary DNS, but you are > doing their secondary DNS (on 2 of your name servers) for them, is it > better pr

Re: Tertiary or 2nd Secondary DNS?

2003-07-08 Thread John Payne
--On Tuesday, July 8, 2003 4:22 PM -0400 "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: This question might be more suitable for inet-access, but it's down, so I'm resending here: Silly question: If you have a customer who is doing their own primary DNS, but you are doing their secondary DNS

Re: [Tertiary or 2nd Secondary DNS?]

2003-07-08 Thread Joshua Sahala
i personally point all of my 'secondary' servers at theirs for the 'primary' or master. having my box slave off another of my boxes that is a slave is sort of like rip routing - dns by rumour anyone... i prefer this method because then they are the 'only ones' who can screw up the zones...(not re

Tertiary or 2nd Secondary DNS?

2003-07-08 Thread up
This question might be more suitable for inet-access, but it's down, so I'm resending here: Silly question: If you have a customer who is doing their own primary DNS, but you are doing their secondary DNS (on 2 of your name servers) for them, is it better practice on your 2nd DNS server to xfer