Re: US Extradition rights (was Re: Spamhaus Exposed)

2004-03-18 Thread Stephen J. Wilcox
> Do you support the converse, where some little s*** hacks my London network > from some random US college ? At the moment, I have no recourse of any kind > and the UK authorities have no power, and as a consequence, no interest. I'd get a London network before I worried about being hacked..

Re: US Extradition rights (was Re: Spamhaus Exposed)

2004-03-18 Thread Jason Slagle
On Thu, 18 Mar 2004, Dave Howe wrote: > Oh, so do I - I just think on general principles it really should require > a judge in the serving country to rubberstamp it before the snatch and > grab takes place - or more appropriately that the case be made to a UK > judge, the child tried here and sen

Re: US Extradition rights (was Re: Spamhaus Exposed)

2004-03-18 Thread Henry Linneweh
This entire fiasco needs to migrate off line, please   -HenryWilliam Warren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: could this be taken offlist please?Dave Howe wrote:> Joshua Brady wrote:> >>The "Child" you speak of caused destruction over a network, the same>>applied for the 2 hackers here who were sent ove

Re: US Extradition rights (was Re: Spamhaus Exposed)

2004-03-18 Thread William Warren
could this be taken offlist please? Dave Howe wrote: Joshua Brady wrote: The "Child" you speak of caused destruction over a network, the same applied for the 2 hackers here who were sent over without even questioning the UK. If the US Government is Satan then I suppose I am going to hell, becaus

Re: US Extradition rights (was Re: Spamhaus Exposed)

2004-03-18 Thread Dave Howe
Joshua Brady wrote: > The "Child" you speak of caused destruction over a network, the same > applied for the 2 hackers here who were sent over without even > questioning the UK. If the US Government is Satan then I suppose I am > going to hell, because I sure as hell support it. Oh, so do I - I ju

RE: US Extradition rights (was Re: Spamhaus Exposed)

2004-03-18 Thread McBurnett, Jim
->Joshua Brady wrote: ->> The "Child" you speak of caused destruction over a network, the same ->> applied for the 2 hackers here who were sent over without even ->> questioning the UK. If the US Government is Satan then I ->suppose I am ->> going to hell, because I sure as hell support it. -> ->

RE: US Extradition rights (was Re: Spamhaus Exposed)

2004-03-18 Thread cproctor
> Joshua Brady wrote: > > The "Child" you speak of caused destruction over a network, > the same > > applied for the 2 hackers here who were sent over without even > > questioning the UK. If the US Government is Satan then I > suppose I am > > going to hell, because I sure as hell support it.

Re: US Extradition rights (was Re: Spamhaus Exposed)

2004-03-18 Thread Peter Galbavy
Joshua Brady wrote: > The "Child" you speak of caused destruction over a network, the same > applied for the 2 hackers here who were sent over without even > questioning the UK. If the US Government is Satan then I suppose I am > going to hell, because I sure as hell support it. Do you support th

US Extradition rights (was Re: Spamhaus Exposed)

2004-03-18 Thread Joshua Brady
- Original Message - From: "Dave Howe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Email List: nanog" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2004 9:53 AM Subject: Re: Spamhaus Exposed > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > So, the US gov't is "Satan" going after "innocent" hackers in Wales? > No, but the