On Tue, 10 Aug 2004 05:17:17 -, Paul Vixie said:
i suspect it's not the number of RR's or even the obscurity of those RR's,
but rather the fact that the RR's keep changing in number, kind, and name,
Well, That RR looked totally different last month certainly qualifies said RR
as weird ;)
Edward,
DAU I don't think SPF is worthless [1] but it isn't a drop-in
DAU solution and the impact on infrastructure will be
DAU significant if it becomes widely adopted.
EBD When an architecture is maxed out, it's difficult to make
EBD significant improvents that are drop-in.
On the theory
DC Date: Mon, 9 Aug 2004 15:08:12 -0700
DC From: Dave Crocker
DC DAU I don't think SPF is worthless [1] but it isn't a drop-in
DC DAU solution and the impact on infrastructure will be
DC DAU significant if it becomes widely adopted.
DC EBD When an architecture is maxed out, it's difficult to
On Tue, 10 Aug 2004 04:00:56 -, Edward B. Dreger said:
Without new code/libs to parse the TXT RR, SPF doesn't work. As
long as new code is being written, it seems logical to have
another RRTYPE assigned -- that's one less thing to change later.
On the other hand, having to deploy a new
Without new code/libs to parse the TXT RR, SPF doesn't work. ...
that could be one of the reasons why, two years before the advent of SPF,
i wrote up and circulated jim miller's idea from 1998. if you want to
know about the paths not taken, see http://sa.vix.com/~vixie/mailfrom.txt.
On the
Drew,
Here's the straight scoop:
The New XO SMTP servers are new in the sense that they go back to a
1997 platform rather than a 1993 platform that smtp.concentric.net
derives from. They're both from the Concentric* part of XO, and both
come out of my team, for what it's worth.
What we've
David A.Ulevitch wrote:
1: SRS may just be a boondoggle, we'll see.
Considering MARID seems to be sender id first and the rest nowhere ..
http://www.internetnews.com/xSP/article.php/3390221
This article has the state of these drafts stated incorrectly.
See:
It has come to my attention that XO has "done
away" with some of concentric's email systems and have replaced
them with new "XO SMTP servers" these new XO SMTP servers aren't
allowing people who don't have their mail hosted at XO to relay mail
through them even though they are XO DSL
On Wed, 4 Aug 2004, Drew Weaver wrote:
It is generally the responsibility of the ISP to provide the outgoing
mail transport for your connected users.
This BCP seems to be changing. The new BCP which seems to be evolving
requires customers to authenticate to their home mail server on the MSA
At 03:23 PM 8/4/2004, Forrest W. Christian wrote:
On Wed, 4 Aug 2004, Drew Weaver wrote:
It is generally the responsibility of the ISP to provide the outgoing
mail transport for your connected users.
This BCP seems to be changing. The new BCP which seems to be evolving
requires customers to
On Aug 4, 2004, at 12:23 PM, Forrest W. Christian wrote:
This BCP seems to be changing. The new BCP which seems to be evolving
requires customers to authenticate to their home mail server on the MSA
port and send mail that way. This appears to be being driven by
SPF/Sender-ID-like mechanisms.
DAU Date: Wed, 4 Aug 2004 14:46:02 -0700
DAU From: David A. Ulevitch
DAU I don't think SPF is worthless [1] but it isn't a drop-in
DAU solution and the impact on infrastructure will be
DAU significant if it becomes widely adopted.
When an architecture is maxed out, it's difficult to make
On Aug 4, 2004, at 3:23 PM, Edward B. Dreger wrote:
DAU I think people will realize that if we're remodeling the
DAU boat that much we should have at least made sure we were
DAU fixing something in the process...
Indeed.
[snip]
Running something DNS-based that requires simple parsing is
hardly an
DAU Date: Wed, 4 Aug 2004 15:46:17 -0700
DAU From: David A. Ulevitch
DAU SPF's use of TXT records doesn't bother me so much. It's
Perhaps some other technology would like to use TXT RRs. If
something hogs an entire RRTYPE at a given scope, it really
should have its own RRTYPE. An acceptable
On Wed, 4 Aug 2004, David A.Ulevitch wrote:
SPF's use of TXT records doesn't bother me so much. It's more that
people are (blindly) clamoring for it.
Maybe you should -- draft-ymbk-dns-choices-00.txt
--
Pekka Savola You each name yourselves king, yet the
Netcore Oy
Edward B. Dreger wrote:
DAU Date: Wed, 4 Aug 2004 15:46:17 -0700
DAU From: David A. Ulevitch
DAU SPF's use of TXT records doesn't bother me so much. It's
Perhaps some other technology would like to use TXT RRs. If
something hogs an entire RRTYPE at a given scope, it really
should have its own
David A.Ulevitch wrote:
1: SRS may just be a boondoggle, we'll see.
Considering MARID seems to be sender id first and the rest nowhere ..
http://www.internetnews.com/xSP/article.php/3390221
--
suresh ramasubramanian [EMAIL PROTECTED] gpg EDEDEFB9
manager, security and antispam operations,
17 matches
Mail list logo
