>Does anyone else miss the good old days when nanog readers/attendees
knew why pinging
>the routers you saw in a traceroute directly was not an accurate
measurement of anything?
I miss the succinct, polite answers even more
-donn
Richard A Steenbergen wrote:
Does anyone else miss the good old days when nanog readers/attendees knew
why pinging the routers you saw in a traceroute directly was not an
accurate measurement of anything?
Looking at the Internet Health Check site, I'd think the 50%
availability was down to i
> > Does anyone know what is going on with XO and their peering? My XO
> > circuit is taking weird paths to other carriers, and
> > internethealthreport.com shows elevated latency on all of their links.
>
> Latency looks fine - Network availability is pretty pathetic. I can
> route out our XO p
Berkman, Scott wrote:
> Does anyone know what is going on with XO and their peering? My XO
> circuit is taking weird paths to other carriers, and
> internethealthreport.com shows elevated latency on all of their links.
Latency looks fine - Network availability is pretty pathetic. I can
route o
Does anyone know
what is going on with XO and their peering? My XO circuit is taking weird
paths to other carriers, and internethealthreport.com shows elevated latency on
all of their links. XO won't tell me anything. This also seems to be
affecting US LEC, but I think US LEC buys transit
