Once upon a time, Chris Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Once upon a time, Trent Lloyd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> > The flaw here is that DNS operates over 53(UDP), last time I checked SSH
> > doesn't do UDP port forwarding?
>
> It doesn't forward UDP ports, but you can set up a full IP tunnel
Once upon a time, Trent Lloyd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> The flaw here is that DNS operates over 53(UDP), last time I checked SSH
> doesn't do UDP port forwarding?
It doesn't forward UDP ports, but you can set up a full IP tunnel with
it now.
--
Chris Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Systems and Netwo
On 2/3/07, Gadi Evron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sat, 3 Feb 2007, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
> What do nanogers usually do when caught in a situation like this?
Important question: if memory serves, and you are in the "Paris Charles de
Gaulle International Airport", wireless costs money.
On Sun, 4 Feb 2007, Peter J. Cherny wrote:
At 04:58 PM 4/2/07, Trent Lloyd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
* Set up the profile, to your house/work/etc, of your favorite SSH
client to forward port 53 local to port 53 on your remote machine.
The flaw here is that DNS operates over 53(UDP), last t
Hi Joe,
On Sun, Feb 04, 2007 at 01:30:58AM -0500, Joe Abley wrote:
>
> On 4-Feb-2007, at 00:58, Trent Lloyd wrote:
>
> >The flaw here is that DNS operates over 53(UDP), last time I
> >checked SSH
> >doesn't do UDP port forwarding?
>
> In the interests of dispelling a common myth, DNS operate
At 04:58 PM 4/2/07, Trent Lloyd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> * Set up the profile, to your house/work/etc, of your favorite SSH
>> client to forward port 53 local to port 53 on your remote machine.
>The flaw here is that DNS operates over 53(UDP), last time I
checked >SSH doesn't do UDP port fo
Trent Lloyd wrote:
On Sat, Feb 03, 2007 at 09:22:30PM -0800, Lasher, Donn wrote:
If so, how do you configure your client operating system of choice to
use the novel, un-proxied ports instead of using
port 53?
* Set up the profile, to your house/work/etc, of your favorit
On 4-Feb-2007, at 00:58, Trent Lloyd wrote:
The flaw here is that DNS operates over 53(UDP), last time I
checked SSH
doesn't do UDP port forwarding?
In the interests of dispelling a common myth, DNS operates over both
53/udp and 53/tcp. However, given that a substantial portion of most
On Sat, Feb 03, 2007 at 09:22:30PM -0800, Lasher, Donn wrote:
> >If so, how do you configure your client operating system of choice to
> use the novel, un-proxied ports instead of using
> > port 53?
>
> * Set up the profile, to your house/work/etc, of your favorite SSH
> client to forward port 53
>If so, how do you configure your client operating system of choice to
use the novel, un-proxied ports instead of using
> port 53?
* Set up the profile, to your house/work/etc, of your favorite SSH
client to forward port 53 local to port 53 on your remote machine.
* Make sure your SSH Profile c
On Sat, 03 Feb 2007 13:29:13 -0600
Carl Karsten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Sure I could route dns queries out through a ssh tunnel but the
> > latency makes this kind of thing unusable at times. instead of an
> > ssh tunnel, how about simple port forwarding?
>
> /etc/resolv.conf
> nameser
Sure I could route dns queries out through a ssh tunnel but the
latency makes this kind of thing unusable at times.
instead of an ssh tunnel, how about simple port forwarding?
/etc/resolv.conf
nameserver 127.0.0.1
And then whatever it takes to forward 127.0.0.1:53 to a dns that is listing o
Subject: broken DNS proxying at public wireless hotspots
Right now, I'm on a swisscom eurospot wifi connection at Paris
airport, and this - yet again - has a DNS proxy setup so that the
first few queries for a host will return some nonsense value like
1.2.3.4, or will return the records for
I am running djbdns and my own root-server (tinydns) on my laptop.
To axfr the root and some other zones, I use port 3001 (Cesidian
Root). With cloned (not actually slaved) zones I have no
problem at all but others might still get me.
I have seen the Mac can use things like
nameserver 192.168.2
On Sat, 3 Feb 2007, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
> What do nanogers usually do when caught in a situation like this?
Important question: if memory serves, and you are in the "Paris Charles de
Gaulle International Airport", wireless costs money.
This is after paying, right?
I had this problem i
On Sat, Feb 03, 2007 at 01:00:29AM -0600, Stephen Sprunk wrote:
> Thus spake "Trent Lloyd" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >One thing I have noticed to be unfortunately more common that I would
> >like is routers that misunderstand IPv6 requests and return an
> >A record of 0.0.0.1
> >
> >So if you are
Thus spake "Trent Lloyd" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
One thing I have noticed to be unfortunately more common that I would
like is routers that misunderstand IPv6 requests and return an
A record of 0.0.0.1
So if you are using (for the most part) anything other than windows,
or
Windows Vista, thi
On Sat, 3 Feb 2007, Fergie wrote:
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Use OpenDNS?
>
> - -- "Suresh Ramasubramanian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Right now, I'm on a swisscom eurospot wifi connection at Paris
> airport, and this - yet again - has a DNS proxy setup so tha
Yes, then he's screwed. :-)
As we all are in a similar situation.
Mea culpa.
- ferg
-- Joe Abley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 3-Feb-2007, at 06:20, Fergie wrote:
> Use OpenDNS?
OpenDNS provides service on other than 53/tcp and 53/udp?
If so, how do you configure your client operating sy
On Sat, 3 Feb 2007, Fergie wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Use OpenDNS?
- - ferg
How can that make a difference when he already said that setting NS in
"resolv.conf" does not help.
BTW - personally if name resolution at hotspot is not working (and
sometimes even if
On 3-Feb-2007, at 06:20, Fergie wrote:
Use OpenDNS?
OpenDNS provides service on other than 53/tcp and 53/udp?
If so, how do you configure your client operating system of choice to
use the novel, un-proxied ports instead of using port 53?
Joe
One thing I have noticed to be unfortunately more common that I would
like is routers that misunderstand IPv6 requests and return an
A record of 0.0.0.1
So if you are using (for the most part) anything other than windows, or
Windows Vista, this may be related to what you are seeing.
Cheers,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Use OpenDNS?
- - ferg
- -- "Suresh Ramasubramanian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Right now, I'm on a swisscom eurospot wifi connection at Paris
airport, and this - yet again - has a DNS proxy setup so that the
first few queries for a host will retu
Right now, I'm on a swisscom eurospot wifi connection at Paris
airport, and this - yet again - has a DNS proxy setup so that the
first few queries for a host will return some nonsense value like
1.2.3.4, or will return the records for com instead. Some 4 or 5
minutes later, the dns server might
24 matches
Mail list logo