Hello Jack ,
On Fri, 30 May 2003, Jack Bates wrote:
Mr. James W. Laferriere wrote:
snip
White listing is NOT what was being discussed . Tho is can be
adventagous in the right circumstances .
snip
And neither was Static addressing . Filtering was being discussed
On Sat, 31 May 2003, Mr. James W. Laferriere wrote:
White listing comes with any blacklist. The blacklists in particular
being discussed were the @dynamics, like the PDL and dynablock at
easynet. Both lists quite clearly state how they build their lists and
what they are designed to
On Sat, 31 May 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 31 May 2003, Mr. James W. Laferriere wrote:
White listing comes with any blacklist. The blacklists in particular
being discussed were the @dynamics, like the PDL and dynablock at
easynet. Both lists quite clearly state how they
Oh, the irony of this thread being initiated by someone with an
@covad.com address. ;)
I don't have an answer for the originator, but this reminded me of
something about DNSBLs that I've been meaning to ask. Does anyone know
of a black hole list of dynamic cable and DSL clients? What I really
On Fri, May 30, 2003 at 10:59:50AM -0700, Crist J. Clark wrote:
I don't have an answer for the originator, but this reminded me of
something about DNSBLs that I've been meaning to ask. Does anyone know
of a black hole list of dynamic cable and DSL clients? What I really
want is one that
On Fri, 30 May 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Pretty much all the dialup lists contain dynamically assigned DSL/cable
IPs as well.
I don't have a problem with rejecting a 56k modem user with one of those
lists. Even I'm leary about rejecting mail from DSL/cable customers in
the same
Hello Charles All , Love all of you that want to filter ,
Please do I would bo one of those that you'd filter . I've been
running my little home netowrk for ~8 years using dialup , isdn ,
adsl , cable . Never could get any employer to fork over better
Mr. James W. Laferriere wrote:
Hello Charles All , Love all of you that want to filter ,
Please do I would bo one of those that you'd filter . I've been
running my little home netowrk for ~8 years using dialup , isdn ,
adsl , cable . Never could get any
Hello Jack ,
On Fri, 30 May 2003, Jack Bates wrote:
Mr. James W. Laferriere wrote:
Hello Charles All , Love all of you that want to filter ,
Please do I would bo one of those that you'd filter . I've been
running my little home netowrk for ~8 years using dialup ,
Mr. James W. Laferriere wrote:
snip
White listing is NOT what was being discussed . Tho is can be
adventagous in the right circumstances .
snip
And neither was Static addressing . Filtering was being discussed
based on some unknown (to me probably others as well)
A situation recently popped up that prompted a question:
How many operations utilize any kind of dnsbl (or any other kind of third party
reporting service) on customer facing SMTP servers?
(customer facing == end users of your operation's service receive mail there)
I'm sure legal issues apply;
I do on the ISP I consult with. We use:
dialups.mail-abuse.org (we pay for this)
relays.mail-abuse.org (we pay for this)
relays.osirusoft.com (all of it, 8 zones, 3 from outside sources)
spamhaus.relays.osirusoft.com
proxy.relays.osirusoft.com
socks.relays.osirusoft.com
12 matches
Mail list logo
