I see roadrunner listens.
frodo:~ dig +short houston.rr.com mx
0 .
frodo:~ dig +short houston.rr.com txt
v=spf1 -all
--srs
On Jan 13, 2008 8:55 AM, Suresh Ramasubramanian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A bunch of roadrunner subdomains migrated over to comcast and those are dud.
One operationally
On Tue, 15 Jan 2008, Mark Andrews wrote:
Since there is no [MX] fallback to
Wrong. http://www1.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/current/msg49841.html
Tony.
--
f.a.n.finch [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://dotat.at/
FISHER GERMAN BIGHT: SOUTHERLY BECOMING CYCLONIC THEN WESTERLY 7 TO SEVERE
On Tue, 15 Jan 2008, Randy Bush wrote:
Fallback to A should be removed sure sounds like a plan.
great idea. it will only break mail to 42% of the internet.
Randy's right, though it's email *from* 42% of the Internet that's the
biggest problem. [rant about email from shitty php web forms
On Mon, 14 Jan 2008, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
On Jan 13, 2008 9:55 PM, Tony Finch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 13 Jan 2008, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
One operationally better way to go seems to be Mark Delany's mx0dot
proposal, which started out as an internet draft, but
On Jan 14, 2008 5:08 PM, Tony Finch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
the . convention then it will look up the root's and A records,
which is stupid but should cause the message to bounce as desired. However
if it does implement the convention (just like the usage rules for a SRV
record target
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] you write:
On Jan 14, 2008 5:08 PM, Tony Finch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
the . convention then it will look up the root's and A records,
which is stupid but should cause the message to bounce as desired. However
if it does implement the convention (just like
Fallback to A should be removed sure sounds like a plan.
great idea. it will only break mail to 42% of the internet.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Principle_of_least_astonishment
randy
On Jan 15, 2008 8:53 AM, Mark Andrews [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There are lots of places in the DNS where . makes sense
as a null indicator. RP uses it today, as does SRV. MX
should use it and fallback to A should be removed. It
Fallback to A should be removed sure
Fallback to A should be removed sure sounds like a plan.
great idea. it will only break mail to 42% of the internet.
Since there is no fallback to , in a few years it will
break very little as most of the internet will have IPv6
MTA's (and hence MX's) for their
On Sun, 13 Jan 2008, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
One operationally better way to go seems to be Mark Delany's mx0dot
proposal, which started out as an internet draft, but seems to have
lost momentum .. the concept is sound though.
Exim implements this convention.
Tony.
--
f.a.n.finch
On Jan 13, 2008 9:55 PM, Tony Finch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 13 Jan 2008, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
One operationally better way to go seems to be Mark Delany's mx0dot
proposal, which started out as an internet draft, but seems to have
lost momentum .. the concept is sound
We're bouncing email to houston.rr.com due to the MX being set to localhost.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ host -t mx houston.rr.com
houston.rr.com mail is handled by 10 localhost.
Setting the MX to 127.0.0.1 seems like an odd way to handle the switch.
On Jan 12, 2008, at 7:02 PM, Chris Boyd wrote:
We're bouncing email to houston.rr.com due to the MX being set to
localhost.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ host -t mx houston.rr.com
houston.rr.com mail is handled by 10 localhost.
Setting the MX to 127.0.0.1 seems like an odd way to handle the
A bunch of roadrunner subdomains migrated over to comcast and those are dud.
One operationally better way to go seems to be Mark Delany's mx0dot
proposal, which started out as an internet draft, but seems to have
lost momentum .. the concept is sound though.
14 matches
Mail list logo
