Re: iMPLS benefit

2004-03-22 Thread Enke Chen
>, > sonet twister <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: iMPLS benefit > References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > Enke Chen wrote: > > > Hi, Mark: > > I was no vacation and just became aware of this thread. > > Lucky you! >

Re: iMPLS benefit

2004-03-22 Thread W. Mark Townsley
Enke Chen wrote: Hi, Mark: I was no vacation and just became aware of this thread. Lucky you! > I have some clarifications here: (1) The relevant implementation is "Encapsulating MPLS in IP or Generic Routing Encapsulation (GRE)" for L3VPN (draft-ietf-mpls-in-ip-or-gre-xx.txt) This draft descr

Re: iMPLS benefit

2004-03-15 Thread Yakov Rekhter
Mark, [clipped...] > >>Enabling MPLS over any type of IP tunnel changes the security characteristi cs > >>of your 2547 deployment, in particular with respect to packet spoofing > >>attacks. The L2TPv3 encapsulation used with the extension defined above > >>provides anti-spoofing protection for

Re: iMPLS benefit

2004-03-15 Thread W. Mark Townsley
Yakov Rekhter wrote: No, I was *not* referring to draft-raggarwa-ppvpn-tunnel-encap-sig-03.txt. Redback's implementation that does not require manual provisioning of point-to-point GRE tunnels between MPLS networks and to each and every IP-only reachable PE is *purely* an implementation matter

Re: iMPLS benefit

2004-03-15 Thread Yakov Rekhter
Mark, > Please see inline. in-line... > i heard there is a way to run MPLS for layer3 VPN(2547) > service without needing to run label switching in the > core(LDP/TDP/RSVP) but straight IP (aka iMPLS). > >> > >>ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-to

Re: iMPLS benefit

2004-03-15 Thread W. Mark Townsley
Please see inline. Yakov Rekhter wrote: Mark, i heard there is a way to run MPLS for layer3 VPN(2547) service without needing to run label switching in the core(LDP/TDP/RSVP) but straight IP (aka iMPLS). ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-townsley-l2tpv3-mpls-01.txt See also Mark's

Re: iMPLS benefit

2004-03-15 Thread Yakov Rekhter
Mark, > >>i heard there is a way to run MPLS for layer3 VPN(2547) > >>service without needing to run label switching in the > >>core(LDP/TDP/RSVP) but straight IP (aka iMPLS). > > ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-townsley-l2tpv3-mpls-01.txt > > See also

Re: iMPLS benefit

2004-03-06 Thread W. Mark Townsley
David Meyer wrote: On Fri, Mar 05, 2004 at 10:02:10AM -0800, Yakov Rekhter wrote: Dave, Hey Suki, On Thu, Mar 04, 2004 at 02:14:20PM -0800, sonet twister wrote: Hello, i heard there is a way to run MPLS for layer3 VPN(2547) service without needing to run label switching in the core(LDP/TD

Re: iMPLS benefit

2004-03-05 Thread David Meyer
On Fri, Mar 05, 2004 at 10:02:10AM -0800, Yakov Rekhter wrote: >> Dave, >> >> > Hey Suki, >> > >> > On Thu, Mar 04, 2004 at 02:14:20PM -0800, sonet twister wrote: >> > >> Hello, >> > >> >> > >> i heard there is a way to run MPLS for layer3 VPN(2547) >> > >> service without needing to run labe

Re: iMPLS benefit

2004-03-05 Thread Yakov Rekhter
Dave, > Hey Suki, > > On Thu, Mar 04, 2004 at 02:14:20PM -0800, sonet twister wrote: > >> Hello, > >> > >> i heard there is a way to run MPLS for layer3 VPN(2547) > >> service without needing to run label switching in the > >> core(LDP/TDP/RSVP) but straight IP (aka iMPLS). > > ftp://

Re: iMPLS benefit

2004-03-04 Thread David Meyer
Hey Suki, On Thu, Mar 04, 2004 at 02:14:20PM -0800, sonet twister wrote: >> Hello, >> >> i heard there is a way to run MPLS for layer3 VPN(2547) >> service without needing to run label switching in the >> core(LDP/TDP/RSVP) but straight IP (aka iMPLS). ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-dra

iMPLS benefit

2004-03-04 Thread sonet twister
Hello,   i heard there is a way to run MPLS for layer3 VPN(2547) service without needing to run label switching in the core(LDP/TDP/RSVP) but straight IP (aka iMPLS). Anyone running this in a live network yet? Thanks in advance for any information.   Suki Lim Blacksburg, VA ee.VA.TECH Do you Yahoo