>,
> sonet twister <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: iMPLS benefit
> References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>
> Enke Chen wrote:
>
> > Hi, Mark:
> > I was no vacation and just became aware of this thread.
>
> Lucky you!
>
Enke Chen wrote:
Hi, Mark:
I was no vacation and just became aware of this thread.
Lucky you!
> I have some clarifications here:
(1) The relevant implementation is "Encapsulating MPLS in IP or Generic
Routing Encapsulation (GRE)" for L3VPN (draft-ietf-mpls-in-ip-or-gre-xx.txt)
This draft descr
Mark,
[clipped...]
> >>Enabling MPLS over any type of IP tunnel changes the security characteristi
cs
> >>of your 2547 deployment, in particular with respect to packet spoofing
> >>attacks. The L2TPv3 encapsulation used with the extension defined above
> >>provides anti-spoofing protection for
Yakov Rekhter wrote:
No, I was *not* referring to draft-raggarwa-ppvpn-tunnel-encap-sig-03.txt.
Redback's implementation that does not require manual provisioning of
point-to-point GRE tunnels between MPLS networks and to each and every
IP-only reachable PE is *purely* an implementation matter
Mark,
> Please see inline.
in-line...
> i heard there is a way to run MPLS for layer3 VPN(2547)
> service without needing to run label switching in the
> core(LDP/TDP/RSVP) but straight IP (aka iMPLS).
> >>
> >>ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-to
Please see inline.
Yakov Rekhter wrote:
Mark,
i heard there is a way to run MPLS for layer3 VPN(2547)
service without needing to run label switching in the
core(LDP/TDP/RSVP) but straight IP (aka iMPLS).
ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-townsley-l2tpv3-mpls-01.txt
See also Mark's
Mark,
> >>i heard there is a way to run MPLS for layer3 VPN(2547)
> >>service without needing to run label switching in the
> >>core(LDP/TDP/RSVP) but straight IP (aka iMPLS).
>
> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-townsley-l2tpv3-mpls-01.txt
>
> See also
David Meyer wrote:
On Fri, Mar 05, 2004 at 10:02:10AM -0800, Yakov Rekhter wrote:
Dave,
Hey Suki,
On Thu, Mar 04, 2004 at 02:14:20PM -0800, sonet twister wrote:
Hello,
i heard there is a way to run MPLS for layer3 VPN(2547)
service without needing to run label switching in the
core(LDP/TD
On Fri, Mar 05, 2004 at 10:02:10AM -0800, Yakov Rekhter wrote:
>> Dave,
>>
>> > Hey Suki,
>> >
>> > On Thu, Mar 04, 2004 at 02:14:20PM -0800, sonet twister wrote:
>> > >> Hello,
>> > >>
>> > >> i heard there is a way to run MPLS for layer3 VPN(2547)
>> > >> service without needing to run labe
Dave,
> Hey Suki,
>
> On Thu, Mar 04, 2004 at 02:14:20PM -0800, sonet twister wrote:
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> i heard there is a way to run MPLS for layer3 VPN(2547)
> >> service without needing to run label switching in the
> >> core(LDP/TDP/RSVP) but straight IP (aka iMPLS).
>
> ftp://
Hey Suki,
On Thu, Mar 04, 2004 at 02:14:20PM -0800, sonet twister wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> i heard there is a way to run MPLS for layer3 VPN(2547)
>> service without needing to run label switching in the
>> core(LDP/TDP/RSVP) but straight IP (aka iMPLS).
ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-dra
Hello,
i heard there is a way to run MPLS for layer3 VPN(2547) service without needing to run label switching in the core(LDP/TDP/RSVP) but straight IP (aka iMPLS). Anyone running this in a live network yet? Thanks in advance for any information.
Suki Lim
Blacksburg, VA
ee.VA.TECH
Do you Yahoo
12 matches
Mail list logo