On 23.07 22:30, Simon Waters wrote:
>
> The abstract doesn't mention that the TTL on NS records is found to be
> important for scalability of the DNS.
Sic!
And it is the *child* TTL that counts for most implementations.
On Fri, 23 Jul 2004 22:30:46 BST, Simon Waters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> I think relying on accurate DNS information to distinguish spammers from
> genuine senders is at best shakey currently, the only people I can think
> would suffer with making it easier and quicker to create new domains
> w
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
| Date: Fri, 23 Jul 2004 17:01:54 +
| From: Paul Vixie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
| Subject: that MIT paper again (Re: VeriSign's rapid DNS updates in
.com/.net )
|
|>>wrt the mit paper on why small ttl's are harmless, i recommend that
|>>y'all actually re
