Are such networks maintained somewhere? SPEWS?
-GSH
- Original Message -
From: william(at)elan.net [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Suresh Ramasubramanian [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Henry Linneweh [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 12, 2004 4:37 AM
Subject: Re:
Behind all of LACNIC's 200/8 and Iskimaro, whoever the heck they are!
Are you sure about this? I find it hard to believe that
you can justify blocking such a large chunk of
South and Central America. How many different networks
operators are you blocking in 200/8 ?
--Michael Dillon
On Thu, Mar 11, 2004 at 10:59:01PM -0800, just me wrote:
|
| Behind all of LACNIC's 200/8 and Iskimaro, whoever the heck they are!
|
I'd say that it is not a wise thing to do, but it is up to you.
Inside this /8 block there are a lot allocation to important networks
in our region.
There is
Behind all of LACNIC's 200/8 and Iskimaro, whoever the heck they are!
matto
In that case you would be blocking all the networks in 29 economies in
Latin american and caribbean region.
I recomend you verify for more detail information about ip address
allocation inside 200/8 in LACNIC whois
German Valdez wrote:
In that case you would be blocking all the networks in 29 economies in
Latin american and caribbean region.
The people doing this generally know this. They often also block big
chunks of APNIC too. They often believe that the ratio of legitimate
mail to spam coming from
On 03/12/04, Gu?bj?rn S. Hreinsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Are such networks maintained somewhere? SPEWS?
http://www.spamhaus.org/ is always a good place to start.
They've got the most comprehensive public collection of
information about spammer operations.
--
J.D.
On Fri, 12 Mar 2004, Ricardo G Patara wrote:
On Thu, Mar 11, 2004 at 10:59:01PM -0800, just me wrote:
|
| Behind all of LACNIC's 200/8 and Iskimaro, whoever the heck they are!
I'd say that it is not a wise thing to do, but it is up to you.
Inside this /8 block there are a lot
--- hrlinneweh wrote:
tekmailer.com and moosq.com are 2 of the primary
abusers from this hosting company
Wholesale Bandwidth are spammers, the 4th worst in the
world according to spamhaus.org.
According to senderbase.org, those two domains are the
8th and 18th biggest sources of all Internet
Hello,
I also just want to make clear that there is nothing personal going on
neither from my side.
BTW, I tried to answer this directly to you, but as you block the whole
200/8, it was not possible.
Interestingly, this could be your your first ham message from LACNIC
region. Not this time...
--- hrlinneweh wrote:
tekmailer.com and moosq.com are 2 of the primary
abusers from this hosting company
Wholesale Bandwidth are spammers, the 4th worst in the
world according to spamhaus.org.
But 69.6.0.0/18 is not listed in
http://www.spamhaus.org/drop/
Is the Spamhaus BL different
Ricardo G Patara wrote:
According to some statistics USA is one of the top in the list of
spammers.
Do you filter all American blocks in your network? I guess not. You
wisely filter only some, like this 69.6.0.0/18.
Do you filter all Asia blocks? I guess not...
When this came up the previous
--On Thursday, March 11, 2004 7:11 PM -0800 Henry Linneweh
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have received almost 200 different spam messages from domains hosted
by this
spam-l is over that way -
google is also your friend
and do you have to keep sending multipart mail?
I have received almost 200 different spam messages from domains hosted by this
provider from russain domains attempting to sell pharmacueticals and other unsolicited
services that I do not want tekmailer.com and moosq.com are 2 of the primary
abusers from this hosting company
-Henry
Message
On Thursday, March 11, 2004 10:11 PM [EST], Henry Linneweh
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have received almost 200 different spam messages from domains hosted by
this provider from russain domains attempting to sell pharmacueticals and
other unsolicited services that I do not want tekmailer.com
Henry Linneweh writes on 3/12/2004 8:41 AM:
I have received almost 200 different spam messages from domains
hosted by this provider from russain domains attempting to sell
pharmacueticals and other unsolicited services that I do not want
tekmailer.com and moosq.com are 2 of the primary abusers
On Fri, 12 Mar 2004, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
Henry Linneweh writes on 3/12/2004 8:41 AM:
I have received almost 200 different spam messages from domains
hosted by this provider from russain domains attempting to sell
pharmacueticals and other unsolicited services that I do not
On Fri, 12 Mar 2004, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
Wholesalebandwidth = Scott Richter.
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=scott+richter+wholesalebandwidth
You can safely nullroute 69.6.0.0/18
You can say that again. He's a strong third on my list:
http://mrtg.snark.net/nullstats.cgi
17 matches
Mail list logo
