* Aaron Glenn [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-03-26 03:14]:
On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 6:15 PM, Patrick Clochesy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Very interesting study I had not seen, and a bummer. That really puts a
cramp in my advocation of our CARP+pf load balancers/firewalls/gateways.
Than again,
Dear list,
Thanks to everyone who has respond to me by privat mails.
I just want to ask if anyone else have major troubles to install new or
upgrade services with Global Crossing ?
It seems that I'm not the only one who has troubles with installations
and trouble tickets in the past 12
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon May 19 06:30:15 2008
From: Erich Hohermuth [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: nanog@nanog.org
Date: Mon, 19 May 2008 13:29:39 +0200
Subject: Re: [NANOG] Installation troubles with GlobalCrossing
Dear list,
Thanks to everyone who has respond to me by privat mails.
I just
On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 5:45 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's the people who pop up and smear Gadi that I really wonder
about. There seems to be no good reason for this, unless possibly
they are blackhats of some sort. I remember a few years ago
when William Leibzon posted about his work
Hey Y'all,
We're seeing a marked increase of spam originating from Earthlink mail
servers over the past week and a half. Is anyone else seeing a spike
localized to Earthlink as well?
Thank you in advance.
Best Regards,
Jason
---
Jason J. W. Williams
COO/CTO, DigiTar
Wouldn't this level of verification/authentication of running code be a
pretty trivial function via RANCID or similar tool?
I understand *why* we are worried about rootkits on individual servers.
On essentially closed platforms this isn't going to be rocket science.
It may seem odd by today's
I understand *why* we are worried about rootkits on
individual servers.
On essentially closed platforms this isn't going to be
rocket science.
It may seem odd by today's BCPs, but booting up from golden
images via
write-protected hardware or TFTP or similar is pretty
Buhrmaster, Gary wrote:
I understand *why* we are worried about rootkits on
individual servers.
On essentially closed platforms this isn't going to be
rocket science.
It may seem odd by today's BCPs, but booting up from golden
images via
write-protected hardware or TFTP or similar
Jason J. W. Williams wrote:
We're seeing a marked increase of spam originating from Earthlink mail
servers over the past week and a half. Is anyone else seeing a spike
localized to Earthlink as well?
We've seen a fair amount lately. Additionally, a couple of people I
assist with
The only issue I had with them recently was the aforementioned 5Mbps
ICMP rate-limiting on an inappropriately sized circuit and not understanding
why I thought it was inappropriate to apply that filter to circuits of any size
without any thought to how it would (to a lesser extent
5mb limit ingressing/traversing their backbone?
Or 5mb limit to their router's control plane?
Important to differentiate between the two. I'd call the former
totally unacceptable, and actionable per SLA 'till resolved (besides,
whoever got taken down by a multi-gigabit PING FLOOD?); the latter
On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 6:03 PM, Paul Wall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
5mb limit ingressing/traversing their backbone?
Or 5mb limit to their router's control plane?
Important to differentiate between the two. I'd call the former
totally unacceptable, and actionable per SLA 'till resolved
12 matches
Mail list logo
