Re: [NANOG] IOS rootkits

2008-05-20 Thread Gadi Evron
On Mon, 19 May 2008, Deepak Jain wrote: Wouldn't this level of verification/authentication of running code be a pretty trivial function via RANCID or similar tool? Absolutely, and it actually makes sense. The problem though is that it is one again an escalation war and counter-inventions

Re: [NANOG] Unique v6 (video) content

2008-05-20 Thread Max Tulyev
Hello Michael, I'm getting the permanent error message: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~/temp $ mplayer http://master.nacevi.cz/ct24v6.asp MPlayer dev-SVN-rUNKNOWN-4.1.2 (C) 2000-2008 MPlayer Team CPU: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU E4500 @ 2.20GHz (Family: 6, Model: 15, Stepping: 13) CPUflags: MMX: 1

Re: [NANOG] Unique v6 (video) content

2008-05-20 Thread Robert E. Seastrom
Michal Krsek [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Hello, several months ago we have had a discussion about IPv6 content. There has been a proposal that having some adult content IPv6 only should be a good idea. I'm not p0rn hoster, but I'm very close to IP content delivery network for Czech

Re: [NANOG] Unique v6 (video) content

2008-05-20 Thread Nathan Ward
On 20/05/2008, at 11:56 PM, Robert E. Seastrom wrote: Michal Krsek [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Hello, several months ago we have had a discussion about IPv6 content. There has been a proposal that having some adult content IPv6 only should be a good idea. I'm not p0rn hoster, but I'm

Re: [NANOG] Unique v6 (video) content

2008-05-20 Thread GIULIANO (UOL)
__ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 3113 (20080520) __ The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus. http://www.eset.com ___ NANOG mailing list NANOG@nanog.org http://mailman.nanog.org

Re: [NANOG] Unique v6 (video) content

2008-05-20 Thread Marc Manthey
hello, works on videolan osx leopard , just a few seconds then it stops , because my connections is not good enough 15:12:25.779523 IP6 mini.stattfernsehen.com.55362 2a02:1d0:2::217:a4ff:feaa:e6e7.ms-streaming: S 613680145:613680145(0) win 65535 mss 1440,nop,wscale 2,nop,nop,timestamp

Re: [NANOG] Unique v6 (video) content

2008-05-20 Thread Michal Krsek
Dear Marc, if you (or other users) have not enough capacity for watching 1.5 Mb/s stream, you can use lower (comodity) bitrate. You can use comodity URLs: http://master.nacevi.cz/asx/ct24livewh.asx (400 Kb/s) http://master.nacevi.cz/asx/ct24livewl.asx (225 Kb/s) Regards

[NANOG] An account of the Estonian Internet War

2008-05-20 Thread Gadi Evron
About a year ago after coming back from Estonia I promised I'd send in an account of the Estonian war. The postmortem analysis and recommendations I later wrote for the Estonian CERT are not yet public. A few months ago I wrote an article for the Georgetown Journal of International Affairs,

[NANOG] AUTO: Kamal Mehta is on vacation (returning 05/21/2008)

2008-05-20 Thread Kamal Mehta
I am out of the office until 05/21/2008. I am on vacation and will not have access to e-mail. I will try to reply to your message on my return. If you need immediate assistance, please call the IBM AOD Service Center at 877-737-3700. Note: This is an automated response to your message

[NANOG] AUTO: Kamal Mehta is on vacation (returning 05/21/2008)

2008-05-20 Thread Kamal Mehta
I am out of the office until 05/21/2008. I am on vacation and will not have access to e-mail. I will try to reply to your message on my return. If you need immediate assistance, please call the IBM AOD Service Center at 877-737-3700. Note: This is an automated response to your message

[NANOG] Multihoming for small frys?

2008-05-20 Thread William Herrin
Hi folks, An administrative question about multihoming: I have a client who needs to multihome with multiple vendors for reliability purposes, currently in the Northern Virginia area and later on with a fail-over site, probably in Hawaii. They have only a very modest need for bandwidth and

Re: [NANOG] Multihoming for small frys?

2008-05-20 Thread david raistrick
On Tue, 20 May 2008, William Herrin wrote: The last I heard, the way to make this happen was: Find a service provider with IP blocks available in ARIN's set of /8's that permit that part isn't required. Generally any /24 will do in my experience except for specific cases. Other than

Re: [NANOG] Multihoming for small frys?

2008-05-20 Thread Robert D. Scott
The /24 address block has to be portable, an assignment, or the owner needs to grant the secondary advertiser an LOA to readvertise that block. The LOA is pretty common, but some ISPs may require you to renumber to get into address space they will permit you to use and multihome. As always your

Re: [NANOG] Multihoming for small frys?

2008-05-20 Thread Andy Dills
On Tue, 20 May 2008, William Herrin wrote: Hi folks, An administrative question about multihoming: I have a client who needs to multihome with multiple vendors for reliability purposes, currently in the Northern Virginia area and later on with a fail-over site, probably in Hawaii. They

Re: [NANOG] Multihoming for small frys?

2008-05-20 Thread Tony Varriale
AFAIK, ARIN doesn't give out /22s anymore. Last time I went to the well...it's was a /20 or better. tv - Original Message - From: Andy Dills [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: William Herrin [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: nanog@nanog.org Sent: Tuesday, May 20, 2008 11:05 PM Subject: Re: [NANOG] Multihoming

Re: [NANOG] Multihoming for small frys?

2008-05-20 Thread Nathan Ward
On 21/05/2008, at 4:31 PM, Tony Varriale wrote: AFAIK, ARIN doesn't give out /22s anymore. Last time I went to the well...it's was a /20 or better. Interesting.. I've had /24s for customers before, with APNIC's multi-homing assignments. http://www.apnic.net/info/faq/multihoming_faq.html