[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That's the reason we need list moderators, to CULTIVATE the list and
encourage more signal in the postings.
I don't know about moderators, but I do think list admins are
appropriate. You want someone to watch the list and curtail
inappropriate behavior (and
http://www.47-usc-230c2.org/chapter3.html
This time 128.168/16 - and by the same group that seems to have
acquired control of the earlier one.
luckily, there is no black market in address space. or at
least so the theory goes on arin and ripe public policy lists.
No, the theory
Steve Bertrand wrote:
Hi everyone,
We are experiencing an issue in regards to SMTP MTA relay responses
regarding 'no such user', and it *apparently* appears to be only
occurring when a particular site attempts to deliver email to us.
For the sake of completeness...
The problem has been
On Jun 18, 2008, at 7:57 AM, Joe Provo wrote:
On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 10:59:21PM -0700, Tomas L. Byrnes wrote:
[snip]
See no evil, hear no evil, fear no evil
The (human) operators who cared have been pushed out by the
(coprorate) operators who would rather disavow responsibility,
turn up
The (human) operators who cared have been pushed out by the
(coprorate) operators who would rather disavow responsibility,
turn up quickly, and book the revenue instead of vetting any
customer claims for basis in fact or reason. Customer
filtering -even when black hats drive an AS- is Not
On Tue, Jun 17, 2008, Christopher Morrow wrote:
most of the larger free-nix's do BT downloads on release day(s).
Revision3 distributes their content via BT. There were rumors of
Disney and Apple moving to BT models for their content distribution at
one point as well.
random type=idea from
On 18 Jun 2008, at 10:42, Adrian Chadd wrote:
random type=idea from tonight
If only there was a way for a SP to run a BitTorrent type service for
their clients, subscribing the BT server(s) to known-good (ie, not
warez-y)
torrents pre-seeded from trusted sources and then leaving it the hell
On Jun 18, 2008, at 10:42 AM, Adrian Chadd wrote:
On Tue, Jun 17, 2008, Christopher Morrow wrote:
most of the larger free-nix's do BT downloads on release day(s).
Revision3 distributes their content via BT. There were rumors of
Disney and Apple moving to BT models for their content
On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 10:52:38AM -0400,
Joe Abley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
a message of 41 lines which said:
The behaviour I have observed with BitTorrent is that clients are
handed a relatively short list of potential peers by the tracker,
and it's quite common for sensible, close, local
On 19/06/2008, at 2:52 AM, Joe Abley wrote:
On 18 Jun 2008, at 10:42, Adrian Chadd wrote:
random type=idea from tonight
If only there was a way for a SP to run a BitTorrent type service for
their clients, subscribing the BT server(s) to known-good (ie, not
warez-y)
torrents pre-seeded from
Christopher Morrow wrote:
On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 9:53 AM, Netfortius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Has anybody used (and been successful at) a bit-torrent-like agent for fast
distribution of LEGAL software (install programs of large-DVD size), across
multiple sites, all over the globe, with bad
Hi folks,
As mentioned in the NANOG Program Committee call minutes, posted at
http://www.nanog.org/pc.nanog44_minutes.html, we are currently accepting
presentations for both NANOG44 and NANOG45. Several abstracts have been
received for the October meeting and we are going to assume they are
To address the original question, there are several p2p companies focusing on
optimizing p2p for internal distribution of software and rich media. In
particular, Kontiki and Ignite both offer such services, and between the two
have many of the Fortune 1000 as customers (Coke, Bank of America,
On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 10:42:22PM +0800, Adrian Chadd wrote:
[...]
random type=idea from tonight
If only there was a way for a SP to run a BitTorrent type service for
their clients, subscribing the BT server(s) to known-good (ie, not warez-y)
torrents pre-seeded from trusted sources and then
Nathan Ward wrote:
There was a product around that would keep track of torrents and fudge
the tracker responses to direct you to on-net peers where possible. Not
sure what it's called. Inline box thing, much like Sandvine, Allot, etc.
I imagine you could either inject the details of a local
15 matches
Mail list logo
