* Adrian Chadd:
1 mil pps has been broken that way, but it uses lots of cores to get there.
(8, I think?)
Was this with one packet flow, or with millions of them?
Traditionally, software routing performance on hosts systems has been
optimized for few and rather long flows.
Anyway, with
On Sat, Jul 26, 2008, Florian Weimer wrote:
Was this with one packet flow, or with millions of them?
I believe it was 1 flow. The guy is using an Ixia; I don't know how
he has it configured.
Traditionally, software routing performance on hosts systems has been
optimized for few and rather
Ok, it's probably a stupid question, but given the relative ease of putting
4gb+ ram on a 64bit platform,
could packet per second performance be improved by brute forcing the route
lookup as an array of 1 byte destination interface indexes for a contiguous
swath of /32's from bottom to top?
Route
On Sat, Jul 26, 2008, Florian Weimer wrote:
Was this with one packet flow, or with millions of them?
I believe it was 1 flow. The guy is using an Ixia; I don't know how
he has it configured.
Traditionally, software routing performance on hosts systems has been
optimized for few and
Hi all,
Does anyone have a contact or a known administrative path to get
NS glue added to
domains registered with Network Solutions? Or is the only choice to
move the domains in
question to a different registrar?
(Perhaps more appropriate for dns-operations, but as it is an
We tried getting Network Solutions to add an glue record by sending
email to various addresses (starting with the one below) with no success,
and then switched to calling.
Their after hours customer service didn't know anything about IPv6 host
records or IPv6 nameserver glue, however their
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Randy Bush) writes:
i hope all my competitors don't patch.
i think that that statement is false.
the resulting insecurity of that endpoint population will be a tsunami that
will swamp people far away, it'll just be worse for those at the epicenter
(meaning: who don't patch.)
On Sat, Jul 26, 2008 at 1:40 PM, Petri Helenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
William Herrin wrote:
But cards like the Intel Pro/1000 have 64k of memory for buffering
packets, both in and out. Few have very much more than 64k. 64k means
32k to tx and 32k to rx. Means you darn well better generate
what i do not understand is why people think screaming to the choir will
make any significant difference?
Think about it. Would you rather nobody make a big deal about it and have
it go unpatched lots of places, and have nobody understand what a monumental
train wreck this all is, or would it
* Dorn Hetzel:
Ok, it's probably a stupid question, but given the relative ease of
putting 4gb+ ram on a 64bit platform, could packet per second
performance be improved by brute forcing the route lookup as an array
of 1 byte destination interface indexes for a contiguous swath of
/32's from
On Sat, Jul 26, 2008 at 03:05:18PM -0500, Joe Greco wrote:
what i do not understand is why people think screaming to the choir will
make any significant difference?
And Paul's absolutely correct, this is not something where we can afford to
let that happen.
Paul is correct if
Zed Usser wrote:
Hi all!
There's been some discussion on the list regarding software routers lately and
this piqued my interest. Does anybody have any recent performance and
capability statistics (eg. forwarding rates with full BGP tables and N ethernet
interfaces) or any pointer to what the
On Sat, Jul 26, 2008 at 05:47:54PM -0400, Sean Donelan wrote:
On Sat, 26 Jul 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
there you go. the massive effort to patch would likley have
better been spent to actually -sign- the stupid zones and
work out key distribution. but no... running around
Once upon a time, Andrew D Kirch [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
I'd like to be wrong, but there's no way that any PC/Commodity routing
system is going to work (in any environment other than Ethernet). For
the small ISP starting out (you know, the ones selling T1's/xDSL), there
are no Channelized
Chris Adams wrote:
Once upon a time, Andrew D Kirch [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
I'd like to be wrong, but there's no way that any PC/Commodity routing
system is going to work (in any environment other than Ethernet). For
the small ISP starting out (you know, the ones selling T1's/xDSL), there
https://asahi-net.jp/en/service/ftth.html -- hmm?br
--
No, this email's not real, it's http://deadfake.com
We do its called FIOS.
- Original Message -
From: natalidel
Sent: 07/26/2008 11:56 PM CET
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: So why don't US citizens get this?
https://asahi-net.jp/en/service/ftth.html -- hmm?br
--
No, this email's not real, it's http://deadfake.com
bGuy_Shields at Stream.Com lt;/ba
href=mailto:nanog%40nanog.org?Subject=So%20why%20don%27t%20US%20citizens%20get%20this%3Famp;In-Reply-To=;
title=So why don't US citizens get this?[EMAIL PROTECTED]/abgt; said
at /biSat Jul 26 23:00:47 UTC 2008brgt; /iWe do its called
FIOS.brbrAFAIK they don't
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
bGuy_Shields at Stream.Com lt;/ba href=mailto:nanog%40nanog.org?Subject=So%20why%20don%27t%20US%20citizens%20get%20this%3Famp;In-Reply-To=;
title=So why don't US citizens get this?[EMAIL PROTECTED]/abgt; said at /biSat Jul 26 23:00:47 UTC 2008brgt; /iWe
do its called
well... hard to tell...
Secure Connection Failed
asahi-net.jp uses an invalid security certificate.
The certificate is not trusted because the issuer certificate is not trusted.
that said, can I get FIOS w/o any other
Verizon crap? I just want the fiber transport
Laurence F. Sheldon, Jr. wrote:
What in the world does that say?
Not to add too much noise to the list, but that MUA (x-mailer: DeadFake
Mailer) is sending HTML that's base64 encoded... but with a text/plain
content type. Oops?
-- Kameron
Hi,
So far with 2 test messages, neither have been delivered. It also
does claim it leaves your IP in the email so there IS some tracking
approximately where it came from. I can't verify, of course, since 2 messages
have gone into never never land for me. Doesn't look like it ever got
Can anyone involved with EP.net (bill?) pls contact me? Ive been trying
to get a hold of someone for about two weeks now with no luck regarding
an allocation and problems with it.
Thanks Much,
Chris
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
- -- Joe Greco [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The telcos might disagree... it's a free market... they're free to
market whatever they want.
And they do. Rightfully so, I suppose.
I think the issue that was being discussed -- which I shouldn't
probably
24 matches
Mail list logo
