This report has been generated at Fri Oct 10 21:18:20 2008 AEST.
The report analyses the BGP Routing Table of AS2.0 router
and generates a report on aggregation potential within the table.
Check http://www.cidr-report.org for a current version of this report.
Recent Table History
Date
BGP Update Report
Interval: 08-Sep-08 -to- 09-Oct-08 (32 days)
Observation Point: BGP Peering with AS2.0
TOP 20 Unstable Origin AS
Rank ASNUpds % Upds/PfxAS-Name
1 - AS9583 238199 3.0% 195.7 -- SIFY-AS-IN Sify Limited
2 - AS1803 117148 1.5%
A city, IP address or something along those lines would be helpful ;)
We have a level(3) connection and haven't seen anything yet today
Paul
-Original Message-
From: Josh Marchant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: October 10, 2008 10:32 AM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: LVL3 Issues?
On Thu, 9 Oct 2008 11:48:14 -0700
Scott Francis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.ntia.doc.gov/DNS/DNSSEC.html
vote early, vote often.
And note that you have to use the procedure in the Federal Register
notice for you comment to count.
--Steve Bellovin,
Any one else noticing routing Issues with LVL3? I have customers that
cannot get to some of my IP's that are in the same block coming though LVL3.
Hi all, the LC on 12000 series is 12000-SIP-601 (engine 5) with multiple STM-1
SPA card. As far as I know the engine 5 card cannot do 450Kpps on netflow.
Since the STM-1 is mainly for NB-AMR traffic (95%), do you recommend the
sampled netflow instead? Does anyone aware of the sampled netflow
This is an automated weekly mailing describing the state of the Internet
Routing Table as seen from APNIC's router in Japan.
Daily listings are sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For historical data, please see http://thyme.apnic.net.
If you have any comments please contact Philip Smith [EMAIL
It depends on how many active flows you have at any one time. Also, I
don't think the SIP-601 supports full netflow V5 in hardware, only V8,
which is aggregated netflow, which may not be what you want. It does
do V5/V9 sampled netflow in hardware. The sampled netflow on that
platform is
Hi All,
DoS attack in progress, any upstream info for these guys? their
phone number doesn't respond.
This is the RIPE Whois query server #1.
% The objects are in RPSL format.
%
% Rights restricted by copyright.
% See http://www.ripe.net/db/copyright.html
% Note: This output has been
We are looking to light a two strand fiber link of about 95 miles (or
150km). It would be worth a lot to us not to have repeaters. We are
hoping for Gigabit Ethernet. Sonet is possible but a less attractive
solution. Are there options for this sort of distance? The longest
current link we
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Not surprising -- TurkTelekom has long been known to be a hotbed of
malicious activity, a known hoster for Russian/Ukrainian cyber criminals,
and perhaps one of the most botnetted ISPs on the planet:
http://itw.trendmicro-europe.com/index.php?id=64
Try,
NOC ITMC/NOC +902125209898 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mehmet
From: Paul Ferguson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 11:55:41 -0700
To: Beavis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: NANOG list nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: DDoS Attack in Progress.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
MRV or Finisar are good places to look for your optics. 120km is no
problem for 1G/2.7G. Depending on the qualities of your fiber 150km may
be within the 120km budget.
Deepak
Holmes,David A wrote:
MRV Lambda Driver CWDM claims 200km with Raman amplification cards.
Atrica, now owned by
Thanks to all that replied. A bit more background: By regulation, the
local ILEC is required to supply us with dark fiber where available. They
have taken the regulatory stance that it is not technically possible to use
dark fiber runs of more than 60 miles (prior, their regulatory stance
These guys claim upto 180km:
http://www.bookham.com/datasheets/transceivers/IGP-28111.cfm
Tim:
On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 4:23 PM, Fletcher Kittredge
[EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
Thanks to all that replied. A bit more background: By regulation, the
local ILEC is required to supply us with dark
15 matches
Mail list logo