Re: IPv6 Wow

2008-10-12 Thread Nathan Ward
On 13/10/2008, at 7:24 PM, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote: On Sun, 12 Oct 2008, Daniel Senie wrote: I do wonder whether where the Vista machines on public IPs really are. I also have to wonder if performance is really better when those users are routed over 6to4 in Europe from, say California, or

Re: IPv6 Wow

2008-10-12 Thread Mikael Abrahamsson
On Sun, 12 Oct 2008, Daniel Senie wrote: I do wonder whether where the Vista machines on public IPs really are. I also have to wonder if performance is really better when those users are routed over 6to4 in Europe from, say California, or whether they'd actually get better performance if they

Re: IPv6 Wow

2008-10-12 Thread Mikael Abrahamsson
On Mon, 13 Oct 2008, Nathan Ward wrote: 6to4 is enabled by default in Vista - any Vista machine with a non-RFC1918 address will use 6to4. It is also available in some linksys routers, and is enabled by default in Apple Airport Extreme. I've been told there is a difference between OEM and non-

Re: IPv6 Wow

2008-10-12 Thread Nathan Ward
On 13/10/2008, at 3:46 PM, Daniel Senie wrote: At 06:05 PM 10/12/2008, Nathan Ward wrote: On 13/10/2008, at 9:53 AM, Stephen Sprunk wrote: Mikael Abrahamsson wrote: This brings up an interesting question, should we stop announcing our 6to4 relays outside of Europe? Is there consensus in the b

Re: IPv6 Wow

2008-10-12 Thread Daniel Senie
At 06:05 PM 10/12/2008, Nathan Ward wrote: On 13/10/2008, at 9:53 AM, Stephen Sprunk wrote: Mikael Abrahamsson wrote: This brings up an interesting question, should we stop announcing our 6to4 relays outside of Europe? Is there consensus in the business how this should be done? I have heard o

BGP (hijack) prefix monitoring

2008-10-12 Thread Andree Toonk
Hi All, Given the recent interest in prefix monitoring (hijack) systems I decided to make my monitoring system publicly accessible for those who would like to use it. The original software was written over the course of 1.5 years, mainly for private use to monitor the stability of our prefixes.

Re: IPv6 Wow

2008-10-12 Thread Kevin Day
On Oct 12, 2008, at 3:53 PM, Stephen Sprunk wrote: I can understand why some folks would say stop, but unfortunately Europe has the closest public 6to4 relays to the US, and our own providers don't seem to want to put any up. There are quite a few 6to4 relays outside Europe. I think the p

Re: IPv6 Wow

2008-10-12 Thread Nathan Ward
On 13/10/2008, at 9:53 AM, Stephen Sprunk wrote: Mikael Abrahamsson wrote: This brings up an interesting question, should we stop announcing our 6to4 relays outside of Europe? Is there consensus in the business how this should be done? I have heard opinions both ways. I can understand why

Re: IPv6 Wow

2008-10-12 Thread Stephen Sprunk
Mikael Abrahamsson wrote: This brings up an interesting question, should we stop announcing our 6to4 relays outside of Europe? Is there consensus in the business how this should be done? I have heard opinions both ways. I can understand why some folks would say stop, but unfortunately Europe

[NANOG-announce] NANOG Voting now open!

2008-10-12 Thread Philip Smith
Hi everyone, Voting for the 2008 NANOG SC and Charter amendments is now open. Please refer to http://www.nanog.org/governance/elections/2008elections/ for full details. The actual voting URL is https://nanog.merit.edu/election/. You will need to use your NANOG id and password to cast your vote.

Re: IPv6 Wow

2008-10-12 Thread Mikael Abrahamsson
On Mon, 13 Oct 2008, Nathan Ward wrote: And using a relay at Tele2 AB (Sweden). So really Max, all your outbound IPv6 packets are going via Sweden, even if they're going to elsewhere in the US. Well, actually, Tele2 has 6to4 relays in Stockholm, Paris, Amsterdam and Frankfurt. But correct,

Re: IPv6 Wow

2008-10-12 Thread Nathan Ward
On 13/10/2008, at 6:29 AM, William Pitcock wrote: Hello, That is 6to4. You can tell due to the (2002::) prefix. And using a relay at Tele2 AB (Sweden). So really Max, all your outbound IPv6 packets are going via Sweden, even if they're going to elsewhere in the US. In order to get aroun

Re: Help needed - Cisco Netflow

2008-10-12 Thread Mohacsi Janos
On Fri, 10 Oct 2008, Lee, Steven (NSG Malaysia) wrote: Hi all, I have a customer who has a MPLS network for E/// Media Gateway (MGW) NB-AMR VoIP traffic. The packet size for the NB-AMR traffic is fixed size 110 bytes. During the high load period, it can reaches 450Kpps on a STM-1 link. The

Re: IPv6 Wow

2008-10-12 Thread William Pitcock
Hello, That is 6to4. You can tell due to the (2002::) prefix. William Pitcock SystemInPlace On Sun, 2008-10-12 at 09:07 -0700, Max Clark wrote: > I'm in LA with Time Warner Cable - didn't know they rolled out an IPv6 > link to AMS-IX. > > HOST: macbook.local Loss% Snt Last A

IPv6 Wow

2008-10-12 Thread Max Clark
I'm in LA with Time Warner Cable - didn't know they rolled out an IPv6 link to AMS-IX. HOST: macbook.local Loss% Snt Last Avg Best Wrst StDev 1. 2002:4ca6:18c5::21b:63ff:fef 0.0%100.8 1.5 0.7 4.6 1.2 2. 2002:82f4:21::1 50.0%10 185.4 188.

Re: transcievers/amplifiers for 150 km fiber run

2008-10-12 Thread Francois Menard
or you buy some boxes from BTI Photonics that specialize into taking GigE around the world... F. -- François D. Ménard [EMAIL PROTECTED] On 11-Oct-08, at 12:25 PM, Lamar Owen wrote: On Friday 10 October 2008 14:50:11 Fletcher Kittredge wrote: We are looking to light a two strand fiber li

Paging Ultradns/neustar neteng

2008-10-12 Thread jamie
UltraDNS / Neustar netengs : There is a routing instability in one view of a small part of your network that¹s none the less making my phone blow up. (pdns4) Your noc guys didn¹t exactly get what I was trying to explain ; refer to SR 1-48803905 for some data. An off-list ack would be cool