On Mon, 10 Nov 2008, Scott Weeks wrote:
Using bgplay.routeviews.org/bgplay for my prefixes (also hijacked) it looks
like the damage is only to ASs downstream of either (or both) ASN 3130 and/or
ASN 2914.
Given the large number of respondents to the thread, it looks like a possible
case of
I've just contacted (after three looong hours waiting...) and forward
those e-mails to them. Hope that helps ...
Can someone confirm that the issue is still happening? Maybe a show
bgp something would help me talk to them.
On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 4:12 AM, Frank Bulk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
More contact people here:
http://www.bovespa.com.br/Companies/FormConsultaImpressao.asp?CodCVM=21032
If I knew someone (readily available) who spoke Portuguese I would call them,
but alas, they are sleeping and not technical.
Frank
-Original Message-
From: Tim Peiffer [mailto:[EMAIL PRO
I too have noticed the slip-up from Brazil, here at AS26935, all of our
prefixes appear from them also, PHAS also did nothing for me, but RIPE
tools and BGPmon both show issues.
If anyone from RIPE reads this, awesome job on the tools guys!
If anyone from GLBX reads this, have you had any cont
Using bgplay.routeviews.org/bgplay for my prefixes (also hijacked) it looks
like the damage is only to ASs downstream of either (or both) ASN 3130 and/or
ASN 2914.
Given the large number of respondents to the thread, it looks like a possible
case of no filtering by upstreams and full table a
I sent e-mails to the AS contacts, but don't expect that to do much in the
middle of the night.No live person at the phone numbers.I can't even
get their web site to come up, although if they're re-routing the entire BGP
table internally, go figure. :)
BGPMon's a great thing though!
Som
Obvious, since I posted about it earlier, but confirmed here as well. Has
anyone made contact with these guys? I have yet to...
On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 9:32 PM, Network Fortius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> Same problems here, for AS26028
> Stefan
>
> On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 8:54 PM, Mark Tinka <
Same problems here, for AS26028
Stefan
On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 8:54 PM, Mark Tinka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> Hi all.
>
> Anyone know how we can contact AS16735 and their upstream
> AS27664. We think they are hijacking a number of our
> prefixes (AS24218- and AS17992-originated). Thanks BGPmon:
On Tuesday 11 November 2008 11:00:47 Bill Woodcock wrote:
> Have you tried CERT-BR?
Yes, we contacted them as well. We still have IP
reachability to them from this end.
Cheers,
Mark.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 10:54:01AM +0800, Mark Tinka wrote:
> Hi all.
>
> Anyone know how we can contact AS16735 and their upstream
> AS27664. We think they are hijacking a number of our
> prefixes (AS24218- and AS17992-originated). Thanks BGPmon:
Mine too -
94.228.64.0/20
89.200.216.0/21
193
Mark Tinka wrote:
Hi all.
Anyone know how we can contact AS16735 and their upstream
AS27664. We think they are hijacking a number of our
prefixes (AS24218- and AS17992-originated). Thanks BGPmon:
All 19 of my prefixes for AS57, AS217 and AS1998 are being hijacked by
the same ASN. I sent
On Tue, 11 Nov 2008, Mark Tinka wrote:
> Anyone know how we can contact AS16735 and their upstream
> AS27664. We think they are hijacking a number of our
> prefixes (AS24218- and AS17992-originated).
Have you tried CERT-BR? Uh... I was about to say "they're usually very
resp
Hi all.
Anyone know how we can contact AS16735 and their upstream
AS27664. We think they are hijacking a number of our
prefixes (AS24218- and AS17992-originated). Thanks BGPmon:
e.g.,
Possible Prefix Hijack (Code: 11)
1 number of peer(s) detected this updates for your pref
Anyone noticing issues with as 7018?
Seems to be leaking a lot of random stuff.
Including every prefix of mine, tho that may be partially coincidental as
they're one of my transits..
Check out dampened paths for 7018. A few views outside of jamies-world seem
to confirm this..
-jamie
Pierfrancesco Caci wrote:
err... do you realize there's about 6.4 * 10^9 other people outside of
the USA, don't you?
Caution: I was "admonished" by the cabal for saying just that.
> I would be interested to know what your views on this are with your
vendor hat on :)
Business case conciliates resource contentions... :)
I suppose MPLS v6 control plane would become necessary at Ph-2, or a
later stage of Ph-1.
This is a stupidly simple to implement feature, telling us "we're not ready yet"
is not a sensible thing to do, any technology we can have sooner will ease the
transition
for many people should they choose
17 matches
Mail list logo
