BGP Update Report

2008-11-21 Thread cidr-report
BGP Update Report Interval: 20-Oct-08 -to- 20-Nov-08 (32 days) Observation Point: BGP Peering with AS131072 TOP 20 Unstable Origin AS Rank ASNUpds % Upds/PfxAS-Name 1 - AS4538 193657 1.6% 38.1 -- ERX-CERNET-BKB China Education and Research Network Center

The Cidr Report

2008-11-21 Thread cidr-report
This report has been generated at Fri Nov 21 21:25:56 2008 AEST. The report analyses the BGP Routing Table of AS2.0 router and generates a report on aggregation potential within the table. Check http://www.cidr-report.org for a current version of this report. Recent Table History Date

Re: IPv6 routing /48s

2008-11-21 Thread Florian Weimer
* Mohacsi Janos: On Thu, 20 Nov 2008, Nathan Ward wrote: On 20/11/2008, at 4:06 AM, Florian Weimer wrote: * Michael Sinatra: And it just reinforces the fear that people have against putting records in DNS for their publicly-accessible resources, especially www. Won't current

Re: IPv6 routing /48s

2008-11-21 Thread Jack Bates
Florian Weimer wrote: No, unfortunately broken 6to4 auto-configuration (ie, in Vista, XPSP2, when on a non-RFC1918 IP address) breaks, and you get 90s timeouts before falling back to IPv4/A. This must be a broken RFC 3484 implementation: - 6to4 should be less prerefed than IPv4 if the service

Weekly Routing Table Report

2008-11-21 Thread Routing Analysis Role Account
This is an automated weekly mailing describing the state of the Internet Routing Table as seen from APNIC's router in Japan. Daily listings are sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For historical data, please see http://thyme.apnic.net. If you have any comments please contact Philip Smith [EMAIL

US - UK connectivity recommendations

2008-11-21 Thread Jason LeBlanc
Hi all, Looking for experiences with different carriers for layer 2 connectivity between US and UK. I have not received the bandwidth needs as yet but I am assuming 100mb/s. I am already in talks with a few. Thanks, Jason

Re: NANOG Digest, Vol 10, Issue 71

2008-11-21 Thread Peter Serwe
Message: 1 Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 09:32:45 -0500 From: Matthew Huff [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Level 3 OC-12 cut in SanFran/Hayw To: Brandon Shiers [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: nanog@nanog.org nanog@nanog.org Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

RE: NANOG Digest, Vol 10, Issue 71

2008-11-21 Thread Matthew Huff
Based on prior experience with them, when they tell you they have escalated it, often they have not, if you do not demand to wait on the phone to speak with someone who can address your issue, getting a callback pretty much will never happen. I agree with this 100%. They are anxious to tell

Re: Origin ASN seen vs Origin ASN in Whois Records Report?

2008-11-21 Thread Bill Woodcock
On Nov 19, 2008, at 4:16 PM, Heather Schiller wrote: I don't know if a report like this already exists, but I haven't been able to find one. Can someone (CIDR Report? BGPMon? PCH?) offer a report that shows the discrepencies in Origin ASN according to the whois records, and routes in the

Re: Origin ASN seen vs Origin ASN in Whois Records Report?

2008-11-21 Thread Bill Woodcock
http://www.pch.net/routing-origin-inconsistency/ Andrew Partan just pointed out to me that this is somewhat less useful than it might be if the way we do our web apps were a little more fully documented. There are tool-tips on organization names, which show the actual AS numbers. And