Re: Estimate of satellite vs. Land-based traffic

2009-01-07 Thread Joe Abley
On 2009-01-07, at 01:00, JF Mezei wrote: Northern communities in Canada's arctic rely exclusively on satellite for voice/data. Ditto most Pacific Island nations... Not a lot of data flowing comparatively, but it is their only option so it is more of a mission critical thing than a

Re: Estimate of satellite vs. Land-based traffic

2009-01-07 Thread Marshall Eubanks
French Polynesia has no fiber links at all and relies exclusively on satellite and maybe radio for internet access. It looks, though, like they may finally get fiber sometime in the next decade : http://www.newstin.com/tag/us/95233925 Marshall On Jan 7, 2009, at 1:00 AM, JF Mezei wrote:

RE: Estimate of satellite vs. Land-based traffic

2009-01-07 Thread Frank Bulk
I lived in a Caribbean country where, at the time, most of their LD traffic was over satellite. While people didn't like it, there were times that there was no public off-island access for a few hours at a time. It's just a fact of life, and people get used to it. Those who don't buy a

RE: Estimate of satellite vs. Land-based traffic

2009-01-07 Thread Martin Hannigan
It depends on where in some cases. Take Greenland for example. Prior to Tele Greenland possibly completing the Greenland Connect cable[1] real soon now (Halifax to Nuuk, Nuuk to Iceland, branched to Qaqortoq, with xcon to UK and Denmark) I seem to recall that a large amount of their capacity

Re: Estimate of satellite vs. Land-based traffic

2009-01-07 Thread Marshall Eubanks
When I was working with Svalbard, Internet connectivity was through a satellite link at about 2.5 degrees elevation looking through a notch in the mountains. I don't think it has changed Regards Marshall On Jan 7, 2009, at 2:38 PM, Martin Hannigan wrote: It depends on where in some

Re: Estimate of satellite vs. Land-based traffic

2009-01-07 Thread sthaug
When I was working with Svalbard, Internet connectivity was through a satellite link at about 2.5 degrees elevation looking through a notch in the mountains. I don't think it has changed It has. Svalbard now has undersea cable connection to the Norwegian mainland. See

Re: Single carrier multi-circuit asynchronous routing issue

2009-01-07 Thread Anders Lindbäck
On 7 jan 2009, at 21.05, Niels Bakker wrote: * aaron.milli...@bright.net (Aaron Millisor) [Wed 07 Jan 2009, 20:53 CET]: [..] If I were to prepend the network 1.1.1.0 to come in on 'sprint 1', but have a route to 2.2.2.0 via 'sprint 2' so that traffic comes in on one circuit but returns on

Re: Ethical DDoS drone network

2009-01-07 Thread Bill Stewart
On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 4:11 PM, Roland Dobbins rdobb...@cisco.com wrote: In my experience, once one has an understanding of the performance envelopes and has built a lab which contains examples of the functional elements of the system (network infrastructure, servers, apps, databases, clients,

Re: Estimate of satellite vs. Land-based traffic

2009-01-07 Thread Bill Stewart
At least in the US, satellite use is fairly limited compared to fiber and copper, mainly in the following areas - TV broadcast - Data and voice to remote areas (a few hundred Alaska villages, some connectivity up to oil drilling areas in Alaska, though there's also fiber, plus some Internet