On 2009/01/30 07:56 PM bert hubert wrote:
In general, the Linux packet shaping infrastructure is overly powerful, if
very weakly documented - despite the LARTC efforts.
Overly powerful is a strong word. Sure it has countless poorly
documented features, but then it fails at even the the most
Besides the other solutions listed, you can also take a look at Arbor
(formerly Ellacoya) and Sandvine.
Rubens
On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 3:33 AM, Bruce Grobler br...@yoafrica.com wrote:
Hi,
Does anyone know of any Shaping appliances to shape customers based on IP,
allow for a quota per IP
sorry again just for the records and web NANOG archives
second worth enemy :
Von: Discount Shopperdiscountshop...@ndebeque.com
Datum: 31. Januar 2009 11:36:15 MEZ
An: m...@let.de
Betreff: Wal-Mart Notice: You've been selected to receive a $1000
Wal-Mart GiftCard
Antwort an:
On Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 4:16 PM, marc m...@let.de wrote:
sorry again just for the records and web NANOG archives
You want to archive spam then news.admin.net-abuse.sightings is down
the hall, three doors to your left.
-srs
This morning whilest Googling, I got a bunch of Permission Denied to
/interstitial?... URLs on Google.
Then all my search results got listed as This site may harm your
computer.
Is Google broken, or is the functionality of listing sites as broken,
broken?
Yup, google's gone craaazy.
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3089/3241488702_9a9a994f07.jpg
-wil
On Jan 31, 2009, at 6:50 AM, Peter Beckman wrote:
This morning whilest Googling, I got a bunch of Permission Denied to
/interstitial?... URLs on Google.
Then all my search results got listed as
This morning whilest Googling, I got a bunch of Permission Denied to
/interstitial?... URLs on Google.
Then all my search results got listed as This site may harm your
computer.
Is Google broken, or is the functionality of listing sites as broken,
broken?
I thought I was going nuts, but
On Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 09:50:24AM -0500, Peter Beckman wrote:
This morning whilest Googling, I got a bunch of Permission Denied to
/interstitial?... URLs on Google.
Then all my search results got listed as This site may harm your
computer.
Is Google broken, or is the functionality of
Peter Beckman wrote:
This morning whilest Googling, I got a bunch of Permission Denied to
/interstitial?... URLs on Google.
Then all my search results got listed as This site may harm your
computer.
Is Google broken, or is the functionality of listing sites as broken,
broken?
Confirmed
On Jan 31, 2009, at 9:50 AM, Peter Beckman wrote:
This morning whilest Googling, I got a bunch of Permission Denied to
/interstitial?... URLs on Google.
Then all my search results got listed as This site may harm your
computer.
Yes, I got it for a search link to wikipedia and to my own
Classic :D
http://i39.tinypic.com/ac9qp.jpg
-r
From: Wil Schultz [wschu...@bsdboy.com]
Sent: Saturday, January 31, 2009 9:56 AM
To: NANOG list
Subject: Re: All Google Search Results: This site may harm your computer.
Yup, google's gone craaazy.
Also for NANOG :
Warning - visiting this web site may harm your computer!
Suggestions:
• Return to the previous page and pick another result.
• Try another search to find what you're looking for.
Or you can continue to http://www.nanog.org/meetings/nanog44/ at your
own risk.
Hi.
Just trying to search for website then presented with all search each have
under the text This site may harm your computer, when any of search result
clicked that lead to a google page headed with This site may harm your
computer and no further option to proceed.
I even tried entering
Its spilling over into email processing at gmail now and marking as spam
messages that have links that show bad on google search. Interesting
Saturday morning.
cheers
Jeff
On Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 7:03 AM, Marshall Eubanks t...@multicasttech.comwrote:
Also for NANOG :
Warning - visiting
On Sat, 2009-01-31 at 09:50 -0500, Peter Beckman wrote:
This morning whilest Googling, I got a bunch of Permission Denied to
/interstitial?... URLs on Google.
Then all my search results got listed as This site may harm your
computer.
Is Google broken, or is the functionality of listing
Looks like they are experiencing some internal issue.
On Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 9:04 AM, aljuhani i...@linuxmount.com wrote:
Hi.
Just trying to search for website then presented with all search each have
under the text This site may harm your computer, when any of search result
clicked that
Considering the lingering Comcast gig w/the SEC, I can't see that flying
well. (Unless they manage to pull a PUC/DTE thing like VZ has done in the
past, and manage to get exec(s) placed as commisioner(s)).
Because of Google's insanely disproportionate market domination, I don't
see them staying
confirmed..here in India too...
-Original Message-
From: Frank [mailto:fsmend...@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, January 31, 2009 8:36 PM
To: Adam Young
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: All Google Search Results: This site may harm your computer.
confirmed. same here manila, philippines.
Yeah, google search is broken everywhere in the world right now.
http://isc.sans.org
On 1/31/09, Marshall Eubanks t...@multicasttech.com wrote:
On Jan 31, 2009, at 9:50 AM, Peter Beckman wrote:
This morning whilest Googling, I got a bunch of Permission Denied to
/interstitial?... URLs on
Interesting...its happening in Los Angeles using my Verizon Blackberry but not
on the ATT iPhone.
-bb
- Original Message -
From: Frank [fsmend...@gmail.com]
Sent: 01/31/2009 11:06 PM ZE8
To: Adam Young adam.yo...@mountaincable.on.ca
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: All Google Search
Not only that, but the gMail logo is missing from my gMail for Domains page.
On Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 10:06 AM, Frank fsmend...@gmail.com wrote:
confirmed. same here manila, philippines.
On Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 10:57 PM, Adam Young adam.yo...@mountaincable.on.ca
wrote:
Peter Beckman wrote:
Is Google broken, or is the functionality of listing sites as broken,
broken?
It's broken here.
http://petrie.dereferenced.org/~nenolod/googlefailsit.png
Same here, in Brazil. Weird.
Regards,
Cássio
The reports I am getting (and my direct observation) is that it is
now fixed.
Marshall
On Jan 31, 2009, at 10:19 AM, cas...@gmail.com wrote:
Is Google broken, or is the functionality of listing sites as
broken,
broken?
It's broken here.
Google's back on my connection on Verizon in the Northeast US.
On Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 10:25 AM, Murtaza leothelion.murt...@gmail.com wrote:
fine in Pakistan.
On Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 8:15 PM, S, Somasundaram (Somasundaram)
somasundara...@alcatel-lucent.com wrote:
confirmed..here in
google;s back on India too!!!
-Original Message-
From: Nathan Malynn [mailto:ne...@nerdramblingz.com]
Sent: Saturday, January 31, 2009 9:07 PM
To: Murtaza
Cc: S, Somasundaram (Somasundaram); nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: All Google Search Results: This site may harm your computer.
Google back to norms here, Saudi Arabia.
Just wondering, how could something of this nature goes un-monitored by
google !
-aljuhani
- Original Message -
From: Nathan Malynn ne...@nerdramblingz.com
To: Murtaza leothelion.murt...@gmail.com
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Saturday, January
On Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 9:22 PM, aljuhani i...@linuxmount.com wrote:
Google back to norms here, Saudi Arabia.
Just wondering, how could something of this nature goes un-monitored by
google !
If it was unmonitored .. what do you think, would it have got fixed
within minutes?
--srs
Done on Indonesia...
S, Somasundaram (Somasundaram) wrote:
google;s back on India too!!!
-Original Message-
From: Nathan Malynn [mailto:ne...@nerdramblingz.com]
Sent: Saturday, January 31, 2009 9:07 PM
To: Murtaza
Cc: S, Somasundaram (Somasundaram); nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: All
- Original Message -
From: Suresh Ramasubramanian ops.li...@gmail.com
To: i...@linuxmount.com
Cc: nanog nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Saturday, January 31, 2009 18:56
Subject: Re: All Google Search Results: This site may harm your computer.
| On Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 9:22 PM, aljuhani
On Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 9:31 PM, Marshall Eubanks t...@multicasttech.com
wrote:
Who needs monitoring when you can just scan NANOG ?
Oh, we're the NA*NOC* now?
Thanks for the notice.
Possibly because of the URL contained in the message and/or as appear to be in
html format as composed initially under OE and the copied to another mail
client.
Gmail support notice:
http://mail.google.com/support/bin/answer.py?hl=enanswer=8253
If our system flags a
On Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 7:01 AM, Marshall Eubanks t...@multicasttech.comwrote:
On Jan 31, 2009, at 9:50 AM, Peter Beckman wrote:
This morning whilest Googling, I got a bunch of Permission Denied to
/interstitial?... URLs on Google.
Then all my search results got listed as This site may
FYI, the official explanation has been posted:
http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2009/01/this-site-may-harm-your-computer-on.html
Damian
On Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 6:50 AM, Peter Beckman beck...@angryox.com wrote:
This morning whilest Googling, I got a bunch of Permission Denied to
On 1/31/09, aljuhani i...@linuxmount.com wrote:
Now clicking search results forward to service unavailable page within
google.
...
Yahoo! search engine seem to be working fine as looks have no affiliation
with google
That would be correct; the Yahoo Search engine is not affiliated with
On Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 03:11:30PM -0800, Matthew Petach wrote:
On 1/31/09, aljuhani i...@linuxmount.com wrote:
Now clicking search results forward to service unavailable page within
google.
...
Yahoo! search engine seem to be working fine as looks have no affiliation
with google
Anyone seeing phishing alerts for senders in this thread?
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3080/3243440012_d1f6f1e5e7_o.png
-Chris
On Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 4:40 PM, Henry Linneweh hrlinne...@sbcglobal.netwrote:
I think they clarify what happened here and are pretty straight up about
it.
36 matches
Mail list logo
