BGP Update Report

2009-03-13 Thread cidr-report
BGP Update Report Interval: 09-Feb-09 -to- 12-Mar-09 (32 days) Observation Point: BGP Peering with AS131072 TOP 20 Unstable Origin AS Rank ASNUpds % Upds/PfxAS-Name 1 - AS9583 340993 7.2% 296.8 -- SIFY-AS-IN Sify Limited 2 - AS313089740 1.9%

Multi-home with same provider, BGP convergence issues

2009-03-13 Thread Nicholas R. Cappelletti
Hello, I have sort of an interesting problem, that probably has an easy fix. I've ran into a continuous BGP convergence problem on the cores of the network I administer every time I bring up both of our Savvis connections (we have a single OC-12 and 2 1GigE connections in a multi-hop

Re: Dynamic IP log retention = 0?

2009-03-13 Thread Joe Greco
On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 8:52 PM, Joe Greco jgr...@ns.sol.net wrote: Well most port scanning is from compromised boxes. Once a box is compromised it can be used for *any* sort of attack. If you really care about security you take reports of ports scans

Re: Network SLA

2009-03-13 Thread Athanasios Douitsis
Anyone interested in setting up his own IP SLA probes by hand and then collect the measurements into a database, can use a Perl tool we developed at 2005: http://sourceforge.net/projects/saa-collector It's rather old (SAA got renamed into IPSLA in the meantime) and, in retrospect, the code is a

Comcast postmaster contact

2009-03-13 Thread Darryl Dunkin
Does anyone have a valid postmaster contact for Comcast? They are currently blocking one of my mailservers, yet using the forms on their site to request removal, they report that it is not blocked by them. They are ignoring the actual content of my reports (such as the actual error returned by

Re: Multi-home with same provider, BGP convergence issues

2009-03-13 Thread Raymond Macharia
Hi Nicholas,a simple schematic would help together with configs of how you are announcing your IP blocks. But with what you have indicated, you may need to manipulate your announcements (for example using prepend) and make sure that you don't have the same IP blocks being advertised from the two

Re: Dynamic IP log retention = 0?

2009-03-13 Thread Bobby Mac
Just wondering but the knowledge I have of DHCP is that an IP address is assigned to the same computer (or host) and will continue to do so until the pool of IP's is exhausted. Once that occurs, a new request is parsed by the DHCP server and the oldest non-renewed lease address is checked to see

Re: Multi-home with same provider, BGP convergence issues

2009-03-13 Thread Scott Weeks
--- n...@switchtower.org wrote: From: Nicholas R. Cappelletti n...@switchtower.org I can provide a .png of our current setup for reference or any further information needed. Any help anyone can provide will be greatly appreciated. - The best thing to

Re: Dynamic IP log retention = 0?

2009-03-13 Thread Valdis . Kletnieks
On Fri, 13 Mar 2009 13:57:56 CDT, Bobby Mac said: That said, unless Covad is constantly exhausting it's pool or they mandate that after the lease expires to give a different IP a reverse lookup would give you the hostname of the offender which should remain accurate for some amount of time.

Re: wires mess thread

2009-03-13 Thread Gadi Evron
This came across my RSS feed today from gizmodo: http://www.reddit.com/r/technology/comments/845v3/this_data_center_has_got_its_shit_together/

Re: Dynamic IP log retention = 0?

2009-03-13 Thread Charles
Um Aren't dsl addresses handed out over ipcp? So perhaps a bit more static then dhcp? Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile -Original Message- From: Bobby Mac bobby...@gmail.com Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2009 13:57:56 To: nanog@nanog.org Subject: Re: Dynamic IP log retention = 0? Just

RE: SBC NOC contact

2009-03-13 Thread Frank Bulk
Try dnscont...@att.com; that's what comes up when I WHOIS the domain pbi.net. Frank -Original Message- From: William Pitcock [mailto:neno...@systeminplace.net] Sent: Friday, March 13, 2009 12:21 PM To: nanog@nanog.org Subject: SBC NOC contact Hello, Does anyone here have an SBC/ATT

Re: Dynamic IP log retention = 0?

2009-03-13 Thread Bill Stewart
On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 2:15 PM, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:  After all, you didn't *really* care that the IP was assigned to a computer belonging to Herman Munster, 1313 Mockingbird Lane.  What you actually *wanted* was for somebody (preferably Covad) to hand Herman a clue. Yeah. I miss

Re: Dynamic IP log retention = 0?

2009-03-13 Thread Ross
Joe, I'll respond to you and this will be my last reply to this thread because I know I won't be able to change your mind. Saying a company's business decisions are antisocial just because they aren't doing you want is very unhelpful. I don't know how many large ISPs you have worked for but I'm