I will check this as soon as I go to work this morning. One thing I noticed
was about the Nipper results is that any router where SSH was disabled/Rlogin
was enabled and vice versa.
I will go thru the configuration file once again.
Thank you very much for checking this out!
Subba Rao
---
BGP Update Report
Interval: 02-Mar-09 -to- 02-Apr-09 (32 days)
Observation Point: BGP Peering with AS131072
TOP 20 Unstable Origin AS
Rank ASNUpds % Upds/PfxAS-Name
1 - AS9583 104066 2.4% 96.4 -- SIFY-AS-IN Sify Limited
2 - AS662943772 1.0%
This report has been generated at Fri Apr 3 21:13:56 2009 AEST.
The report analyses the BGP Routing Table of AS2.0 router
and generates a report on aggregation potential within the table.
Check http://www.cidr-report.org for a current version of this report.
Recent Table History
Date
On Thu, 2009-04-02 at 15:33 -0700, Subba Rao wrote:
I am using Nipper for verifying my Cisco configuration. Nipper is
finding the rlogin service that is not in the configuration. I have
searched the access lists and do not see it anywhere. The explanation
by Nipper about this finding,
This is an automated weekly mailing describing the state of the Internet
Routing Table as seen from APNIC's router in Japan.
Daily listings are sent to bgp-st...@lists.apnic.net
For historical data, please see http://thyme.apnic.net.
If you have any comments please contact Philip Smith
Hello:
A little customer has a Cisco 1841 router running ios 12.3(8r)T8.
At the end of this mail is a show version from the router.
Now, he wants to run BGP.
His current ios version 12.3(8r)T8 does not support BGP.
According to Cisco feature navigator, ios version 12.4(24)T
srg wrote:
Hello:
A little customer has a Cisco 1841 router running ios 12.3(8r)T8.
At the end of this mail is a show version from the router.
Now, he wants to run BGP.
His current ios version 12.3(8r)T8 does not support BGP.
According to Cisco feature navigator, ios version 12.4(24)T
For anyone trying to troubleshoot any strange resolution or page loading
issues, Register.com is apparently having a massive DNS hosting outage
that has been going on since 2 days ago, and is still continuing. I
only found out because our monitoring was complaining about one single
domain on and
Yep, we're seeing issues with mail delivery to any domain that has
their zone hosted by register.com. You can follow the action on
twitter:
http://search.twitter.com/search?q=register.com
Various reports that some of the register.com support staff is denying
issues, while others aren't, while
No ETA given to me, just the stock line of We apologize.. blah blah...
as soon as possible.. blah blah.
Jeffrey Negro, Network Engineer
Billtrust - Improving Your Billing, Improving Your Business
www.billtrust.com http://www.billtrust.com/
609.235.1010 x137
jne...@billtrust.com
Looks like a routing issue to their DNS servers.
traceroute to DNS020.C.REGISTER.COM (216.21.235.20), 64 hops max, 40 byte
packets
1 c28.134.nauticom.net (209.195.134.28) 0.778 ms 0.894 ms 0.829 ms
2 10.11.11.9 (10.11.11.9) 1.010 ms 0.799 ms 0.829 ms
3 c246.134.nauticom.net
Looks like a routing issue to their DNS servers from here.
traceroute to DNS020.C.REGISTER.COM (216.21.235.20), 64 hops max, 40 byte
packets
1 c28.134.nauticom.net (209.195.134.28) 0.778 ms 0.894 ms 0.829 ms
2 10.11.11.9 (10.11.11.9) 1.010 ms 0.799 ms 0.829 ms
3 c246.134.nauticom.net
Jeffrey Negro wrote:
No ETA given to me, just the stock line of We apologize.. blah blah...
as soon as possible.. blah blah.
Do you normally give an ETA concerning DOS issues?
Jack
Well if they had said it was a DOS attack I wouldn't expect an ETA.
When all they say is that they're having issues, I expect some form of
ETA.
Jeffrey Negro, Network Engineer
Billtrust - Improving Your Billing, Improving Your Business
www.billtrust.com
609.235.1010 x137
jne...@billtrust.com
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 12:52 PM, Clinton Popovich crpop...@nauticom.net
wrote:
Looks like a routing issue to their DNS servers from here.
traceroute to DNS020.C.REGISTER.COM (216.21.235.20), 64 hops max, 40 byte
packets
1 c28.134.nauticom.net
Jeffrey Negro wrote:
No ETA given to me, just the stock line of We apologize.. blah blah...
as soon as possible.. blah blah.
This is probably a good time to remind the uninitiated to have some
secondary DNS with a totally separate company if your DNS is that
important to you.
~Seth
Actually I found out prolexic is a DDos filter. We fixed the issue by
routing their DNS traffic out another backbone, so far so good.
-Original Message-
From: Paul Ferguson [mailto:fergdawgs...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, April 03, 2009 4:11 PM
To: Clinton Popovich
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Looks like we're seeing DNS queries succeeding again. Hopefully this
time they'll stay up. :)
-matt
On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 1:10 PM, Paul Ferguson fergdawgs...@gmail.com wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 12:52 PM, Clinton Popovich
Seth Mattinen wrote:
Jeffrey Negro wrote:
No ETA given to me, just the stock line of We apologize.. blah blah...
as soon as possible.. blah blah.
This is probably a good time to remind the uninitiated to have some
secondary DNS with a totally separate company if your DNS is that
important
On Fri, Apr 03, 2009 at 01:31:33PM -0700, Charles Wyble wrote:
Seth Mattinen wrote:
Jeffrey Negro wrote:
No ETA given to me, just the stock line of We apologize.. blah blah...
as soon as possible.. blah blah.
This is probably a good time to remind the uninitiated to have some
secondary
According to Cisco feature navigator, ios version 12.4(24)T
(c1841-ipbasek9-mz.124-24.T.bin) can run in the 1841 and
supports BGP (note that feature set is IPBASE):
1) It is common that a version with an IPBASE feature set
supports BGP (some docs says that bgp support is included in
SP
This is probably a good time to remind the uninitiated to have some
secondary DNS with a totally separate company if your DNS is that
important to you.
someone should write an rfc on that
randy
someone should write an rfc on that
why not read the one you wrote, it's just 12 years old
cheers
jorge
On Fri, 3 Apr 2009 17:38:43 -0500
Jorge Amodio jmamo...@gmail.com wrote:
someone should write an rfc on that
why not read the one you wrote, it's just 12 years old
We don't read. Very few system developers are familiar with
work done outside of their own project.
I did see a few false positives too with Nipper. What do you think about
Router Audit Tool (RAT) instead? I downloaded ncat (aka RAT), but it does not
have a global configuration file which I can use for all the routers and
switches I have. Any tips on ncat/RAT configuration? I could not
25 matches
Mail list logo
