Re: Data Centers in England

2009-10-08 Thread Leigh Porter
Simon Lockhart wrote: On Wed Oct 07, 2009 at 02:33:33PM -0700, Philip Lavine wrote: Anyone know a good DC on England that caters to financial industry clients? Telehouse London started as a Banking DR centre, so would probably meet your needs. Otherwise, there's Interxion, which

Re: ISP customer assignments

2009-10-08 Thread Michael Dillon
I would disagree. IPv6 is designed around class boundaries which, in my understanding, are: A layer two network gets assigned a /64 A customer gets assigned a /48 A site gets assigned a /48. It could be a customer site, or one of your many sites or one of a customer's many sites. I interpret

Re: ISP customer assignments

2009-10-08 Thread Michael Dillon
There seems to be a variance between It's OK to just give out a /64 to You better be thinking about giving out a /48. I can live in those boundaries and am most likely fine with either. I'm leaning toward a /56 for regular subscribers and a /48 only for business or large scale customers, and

Re: ISP customer assignments

2009-10-08 Thread Curtis Maurand
Sorry to be a curmudgeon and let me play devil's advocate for a minute. I realize that the address space is enormous; gigantic, even, but if we treat it as cavalierly as you all are proposing, it will get used up. If its treated like an infinite resource that will never, ever be used up

Re: ISP customer assignments

2009-10-08 Thread Tim Chown
On Thu, Oct 08, 2009 at 10:24:30AM -0400, Curtis Maurand wrote: Sorry to be a curmudgeon and let me play devil's advocate for a minute. I realize that the address space is enormous; gigantic, even, but if we treat it as cavalierly as you all are proposing, it will get used up. If its

Re: ISP customer assignments

2009-10-08 Thread TJ
And I will play devil's advocate to the devil's advocate ... wait, does that make me God's advocate? Nice! On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 10:24 AM, Curtis Maurand cmaur...@xyonet.com wrote: Sorry to be a curmudgeon and let me play devil's advocate for a minute. I realize that the address space is

Re: ISP customer assignments

2009-10-08 Thread Michael Dillon
Sorry to be a curmudgeon and let me play devil's advocate for a minute.  I realize that the address space is enormous; gigantic, even, but if we treat it as cavalierly as you all are proposing, it will get used up.  If its treated like an infinite resource  that will never, ever be used up as

Re: Data Centers in England

2009-10-08 Thread Benson Schliesser
Philip- I'm only really familiar with my employer's facilities: Savvis has data centers in London, Slough, and Reading with good exchange connectivity*. There is a financial-firm oriented microsite at http://financial.savvis.net/ , but beware the annoying* embedded video. You can look at

Re: ISP customer assignments

2009-10-08 Thread Dan White
On 08/10/09 11:46 +0100, Michael Dillon wrote: There seems to be a variance between It's OK to just give out a /64 to You better be thinking about giving out a /48. I can live in those boundaries and am most likely fine with either. I'm leaning toward a /56 for regular subscribers and a /48 only

Re: Data Centers in England

2009-10-08 Thread Marco Matarazzo
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 11:33 PM, Philip Lavine source_ro...@yahoo.com wrote: Anyone know a good DC on England that caters to financial industry clients? Have a look at Telecity* too, DCs in London, Manchester and Dublin, others spread out over Europe. Not just colo but a bunch of services too

Re: Help - Unable to builld a IP-SEC VPN on a Cisco ASA 5520

2009-10-08 Thread Eugeniu Patrascu
Devangnp wrote: Does Juniper firewall has same issue? Nope. Just that you need to get an ISG 1000 or ISG 2000 to be able to virtualize nowadays, as the old lower model NetScreen boxes are no longer up for sale.

Anyone seeing BGP weirdness?

2009-10-08 Thread Eric Gearhart
I know this post sounds like a noobish thing to ask, but I've got sites in three different cities - Tucson, Arizona; Devnver, Colorado and Salt Lake City, Utah, and all three of them can't reach certain IPs of our clients whom we have IPsec tunnels to. In one case I can traceroute to 4.2.2.2

Re: Anyone seeing BGP weirdness?

2009-10-08 Thread Andree Toonk
Hi Eric, .-- My secret spy satellite informs me that at Thu, 08 Oct 2009, Eric Gearhart wrote: Is anyone else seeing general routing weirdness on the Internets, or at least can someone point me at a good BGP dashboard site that monitors the state of routing tables at various places? I have

Re: Dutch ISPs to collaborate and take responsibility for bottedclients

2009-10-08 Thread Peter Beckman
Looks like ISP-to-customer notification of possible infection is starting on Comcast in the US now. http://news.cnet.com/8301-27080_3-10370996-245.html --- Peter Beckman

Re: Dutch ISPs to collaborate and take responsibility for botted clients

2009-10-08 Thread Michael Painter
Gadi Evron wrote: [snip] This will be an interesting phenomenon to watch. If it is successful perhaps it could work here too. Comcast is launching a trial on Thursday of a new automated service that will warn broadband customers of possible virus infections, if the computers are behaving as

hotmail send bare LF

2009-10-08 Thread Ingo Flaschberger
Hi, it seems, that hotmail send a bare LF in the added signature (and violates RFC). qmail drops the connection afterwards: 451 See http://pobox.com/~djb/docs/smtplf.html no helpfull response from hotmail: https://windowslivehelp.com/community/t/121824.aspx Kind regards, Ingo

Re: hotmail send bare LF

2009-10-08 Thread Michael Thomas
On 10/08/2009 04:54 PM, Ingo Flaschberger wrote: Hi, it seems, that hotmail send a bare LF in the added signature (and violates RFC). qmail drops the connection afterwards: 451 See http://pobox.com/~djb/docs/smtplf.html no helpfull response from hotmail:

Re: hotmail send bare LF

2009-10-08 Thread Ingo Flaschberger
Hi, it seems, that hotmail send a bare LF in the added signature (and violates RFC). qmail drops the connection afterwards: 451 See http://pobox.com/~djb/docs/smtplf.html no helpfull response from hotmail: https://windowslivehelp.com/community/t/121824.aspx Kind regards, Ingo Flaschberger